Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;99:626-632

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolford, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolford, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing
Right arrow CV surgery: transplantation, ventricular assistance, cardiomyopathy

(Circulation. 1999;99:626-632.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Heterogeneity of Coronary Flow Reserve in the Examination of Multiple Individual Allograft Coronary Arteries

Thomas L. Wolford, MD; Thomas J. Donohue, MD; Richard G. Bach, MD; John H. Drury, MD; Eugene A. Caracciolo, MD; Morton J. Kern, MD; Leslie W. Miller, MD

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, St Louis, Mo (T.L.W., T.J.D., R.G.B., E.A.C., M.J.K.); the Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (L.W.M.); and the Black Hills Cardiovascular Research Group, Rapid City, SD (J.H.D.).

Background—Epicardial and resistance vessel function in the transplanted heart has been evaluated primarily in regions supplied by a single vessel. Heterogeneity of flow among multiple perfusion fields as a marker of early endothelial dysfunction in the microcirculation has not been evaluated previously. This study tested the hypothesis that increased variability of coronary flow reserve (CFR) among multiple vascular regions would be associated with allograft coronary vasculopathy.

Methods and Results—One hundred six posttransplant patients undergoing cardiac catheterization had measurement of CFR in at least 3 major epicardial vessels. Patients were divided into those with minimal angiographic abnormalities (n=37) and those with no angiographic abnormalities (n=69). The ranges, coefficients of variation, and univariate and multivariate regression analyses of CFR were computed to determine the major clinical factors influencing the degree of variability. The abnormal angiographic group was older (54±11 versus 47±13 years; P<0.003), had older hearts (35±11 versus 27±10 years; P<0.005), and were further posttransplant (1626±1022 versus 931±984 days; P<0.0009). There was no difference in global CFR between groups (normal, 3.4±0.8 versus abnormal, 3.4±0.7; P=NS). The coefficient of variation of CFR was higher for the abnormal group (16.3±8.6% versus 11.0±5.5%; P<0.0006). Univariate and multivariate predictors of increased variability in CFR included angiographic abnormalities, patient age, and body mass index. Both angiographic abnormalities and an elevated CV of CFR were predictive of a combined end point of death, congestive heart failure, or subsequent development of >=50% coronary stenosis.

Conclusions—These data demonstrate that increased variability of CFR is associated with discernible allograft coronary arteriopathy and is predictive of outcome in patients after heart transplantation.


Key Words: blood flow • transplantation • arteries




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
V. Voudris, D. Avramides, M. Koutelou, J. Malakos, A. Manginas, M. Papadakis, and D. V. Cokkinos
Relative Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Improves Correlation With Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses
Chest, October 1, 2003; 124(4): 1266 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. F. Fearon, M. Nakamura, D. P. Lee, M. Rezaee, R. H. Vagelos, S. A. Hunt, P. J. Fitzgerald, P. G. Yock, and A. C. Yeung
Simultaneous Assessment of Fractional and Coronary Flow Reserves in Cardiac Transplant Recipients: Physiologic Investigation for Transplant Arteriopathy (PITA Study)
Circulation, September 30, 2003; 108(13): 1605 - 1610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Weis and J. P. Cooke
Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy and Dysregulation of the NO Synthase Pathway
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2003; 23(4): 567 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. A. J. Chamuleau, M. Meuwissen, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, K. T. Koch, A. de Jong, R. J. de Winter, C. E. Schotborgh, M. Bax, H. J. Verberne, J. G. P. Tijssen, et al.
Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestambi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1316 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Kern, S. Puri, R. G. Bach, T. J. Donohue, P. Dupouy, E. A. Caracciolo, W. R. Craig, F. Aguirre, E. Aptecar, T. L. Wolford, et al.
Abnormal Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve After Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients : Role of Relative Coronary Reserve to Assess Potential Mechanisms
Circulation, December 21, 1999; 100(25): 2491 - 2498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]