(Circulation. 1999;99:3155-3160.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.L.B., M.G.M.H.) and Radiology (M.G.M.H.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Julius Center for Patient Oriented Research (Y.v.d.G), University Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands; School of Medicine, Keio University (J.L.B.), Tokyo, Japan; and the Harvard School of Public Health (M.G.M.H.), Boston, Mass.
BackroundTo assess the quality of life in patients with iliac artery occlusive disease, we compared primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Methods and ResultsQuality-of-life assessments were completed by 254 patients in a telephone interview. Assessment measures consisted of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0, time tradeoff, standard gamble, rating scale, health utilities index, and EuroQol-5D. The interviews were performed before treatment and after 1, 3, 12, and 24 months. When the 2 treatments were compared, no significant difference was observed (P>0.05). All measurements showed a significant improvement in the quality of life after treatment (P<0.05). The RAND 36-Item Health Survey measures physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical problems, and bodily pain and the EuroQol-5D were the most sensitive to the impact of revascularization.
ConclusionsHealth-related quality of life improves equally after primary stent placement and primary angioplasty with selective stent placement in the treatment of intermittent claudication caused by iliac artery occlusive disease.
Key Words: quality of life arteries claudication stents angioplasty
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Ouwendijk, M. de Vries, T. Stijnen, P. M. T. Pattynama, M. R. H. M. van Sambeek, J. Buth, A. V. Tielbeek, D. A. van der Vliet, L. J. SchutzeKool, P. J. E. H. M. Kitslaar, et al. Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of the Costs and Effects of Noninvasive Diagnostic Imaging in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease: The DIPAD Trial Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1349 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Vries, R. Ouwendijk, K. Flobbe, P. J. Nelemans, A. G. Kessels, G. H. Schurink, J. A. van der Vliet, F. M. J. Heijstraten, P. W. M. Cuypers, L. E. M. Duijm, et al. Peripheral Arterial Disease: Clinical and Cost Comparisons between Duplex US and Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography--A Multicenter Randomized Trial. Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 401 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. W. Zhuang, G. J. Teng, R. F. Jeffery, J. M. Gemery, B. J. d'Othee, and M. A. Bettmann Long-Term Results and Quality of Life in Patients Treated with Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1597 - 1603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Bosch, E. F. Halpern, and G. S. Gazelle Comparison of Preference-Based Utilities of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey and Health Utilities Index before and after Treatment of Patients with Intermittent Claudication Med Decis Making, October 1, 2002; 22(5): 403 - 409. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Bosch, C. Haaring, M. F. Meyerovitz, K. A. Cullen, and M. G. M. Hunink Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Treatment of Iliac Artery Occlusive Disease in the United States Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 517 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.G. M. Hunink and G. P. Krestin Study Design for Concurrent Development, Assessment, and Implementation of New Diagnostic Imaging Technology Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 604 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |