| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1999;99:2806-2814.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
Autonomic Modification of the Atrioventricular Node During Atrial Fibrillation
Role in the Slowing of Ventricular Rate
From the Department of Cardiology, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Correspondence to Todor N. Mazgalev, PhD, Department of Cardiology/Desk FF1, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail mazgalt{at}cesmtp.ccf.org
Background—Postganglionic vagal stimulation (PGVS) by short bursts of subthreshold current evokes release of acetylcholine from myocardial nerve terminals. PGVS applied to the atrioventricular node (AVN) slows nodal conduction. However, little is known about the ability of PGVS to control ventricular rate (VR) during atrial fibrillation (AF).
Methods and Results—To quantify the effects and establish the mechanism of PGVS on the AVN, AF was simulated by random high right atrial pacing in 11 atrial-AVN rabbit heart preparations. Microelectrode recordings of cellular action potentials (APs) were obtained from different AVN regions. Five intensities and 5 modes of PGVS delivery were evaluated. PGVS resulted in cellular hyperpolarization, along with depressed and highly heterogeneous intranodal conduction. Compact nodal AP exhibited decremental amplitude and dV/dt and multiple-hump components, and at high PGVS intensities, a high degree of concealed conduction resulted in a dramatic slowing of the VR. Progressive increase of PGVS intensity and/or rate of delivery showed a significant logarithmic correlation with a decrease in VR (P<0.001). Strong PGVS reduced the mean VR from 234 to 92 bpm (P<0.001). The PGVS effects on the cellular responses and VR during AF were fully reproduced in a model of direct acetylcholine injection into the compact AVN via micropipette.
Conclusions—These studies confirmed that PGVS applied during AF could produce substantial VR slowing because of acetylcholine-induced depression of conduction in the AVN.
Key Words: atrioventricular node • atrium • vagus nerve • ventricles
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. U. Khand, A. C. Rankin, J. G.F. Cleland, I. Gemmell, E. Clark, and P. W. Macfarlane The assessment of autonomic function in chronic atrial fibrillation: description of a non-invasive technique based on circadian rhythm of atrioventricular nodal functional refractory periods. Europace, November 1, 2006; 8(11): 927 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Zhang, H. Yamada, S. Bibevski, S. Zhuang, K. A. Mowrey, D. W. Wallick, S. Oh, and T. N. Mazgalev Chronic Atrioventricular Nodal Vagal Stimulation: First Evidence for Long-Term Ventricular Rate Control in Canine Atrial Fibrillation Model Circulation, November 8, 2005; 112(19): 2904 - 2911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. S. T. Leung, M. E. Bowman, T. M. Diep, G. Lorenzi-Filho, J. S. Floras, and T. D. Bradley Influence of Cheyne-Stokes respiration on ventricular response to atrial fibrillation in heart failure J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2005; 99(5): 1689 - 1696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. W. Wallick, Y. Zhang, T. Tabata, S. Zhuang, K. A. Mowrey, J. Watanabe, N. L. Greenberg, R. A. Grimm, and T. N. Mazgalev Selective AV nodal vagal stimulation improves hemodynamics during acute atrial fibrillation in dogs Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): H1490 - H1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Zhang, K. A. Mowrey, S. Zhuang, D. W. Wallick, Z. B. Popovic, and T. N. Mazgalev Optimal ventricular rate slowing during atrial fibrillation by feedback AV nodal-selective vagal stimulation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): H1102 - H1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|