This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Garrigue, S. Articles by Mazgalev, T. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Garrigue, S. Articles by Mazgalev, T. N. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Atrial Fibrillation Related Collections Electrophysiology Arrythmias-basic studies

(Circulation. 1999;99:2323-2333.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.

Basic Science Reports

Atrioventricular Nodal Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation

Role of Atrial Input Modification

Stéphane Garrigue, MD; Kent A. Mowrey, MS; Gerard Fahy, MD; Patrick J. Tchou, MD; Todor N. Mazgalev, PhD

From the Department of Cardiology, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Correspondence to Todor N. Mazgalev, PhD, Department of Cardiology/Desk FF1-02, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail mazgalt{at}cesmtp.ccf.org

Background—Posteroseptal ablation of the atrioventricular node (AVN) has been proposed as a means to slow the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF). The suggested mechanism is elimination of the AVN "slow pathway." On the basis of the unpredictable success of the procedure, we hypothesize that, in fact, the slow pathway is preserved. Therefore, the slowing of the ventricular rate results from reduced bombardment of the AVN.

Methods and Results—In 8 rabbit heart atrial-AVN preparations, cooling of the posterior and/or the anterior AVN approaches revealed nonspecific effects on the slow and fast pathway portions of the AVN conduction curve. In 13 other preparations, simulated AF during posterior cooling (n=6) prolonged the His-His (H-H) intervals but did not reveal specific slow pathway injury. In the remaining 7 preparations, AF was applied before and after posteroseptal surgical cuts. During AF with posterior origin, the cuts resulted in longer mean H-H along with slowing of the AVN bombardment rate. However, there was no change in the minimum observed H-H, suggesting an intact slow pathway. During AF with anterior origin, the mean and the shortest H-H remained unchanged before and after the cuts in all preparations. This was associated with the maintenance of high-rate AVN bombardment.

Conclusions—Posteroseptal ablation does not eliminate the slow pathway. Ventricular rate slowing can be obtained if the ablation procedure results in a posteroanterior intra-atrial block leading to a reduction of the rate of AV nodal bombardment.

Key Words: atrioventricular node • fibrillation • electrophysiology • ventricles

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Zhang, S. Bharati, K. A. Mowrey, and T. N. Mazgalev His Electrogram Alternans Reveal Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of Slow-Pathway Modification Circulation, February 25, 2003; 107(7): 1059 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Zhang, S. Bharati, K. A. Mowrey, S. Zhuang, P. J. Tchou, and T. N. Mazgalev His Electrogram Alternans Reveal Dual-Wavefront Inputs Into and Longitudinal Dissociation Within the Bundle of His Circulation, August 14, 2001; 104(7): 832 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C Rankin and A. J Workman Rate control in atrial fibrillation: role of atrial inputs to the AV node Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 249 - 251. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Garrigue, P. J. Tchou, and T. N. Mazgalev Role of the differential bombardment of atrial inputs to the atrioventricular node as a factor influencing ventricular rate during high atrial rate Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 344 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]