This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moussa, I. Articles by Colombo, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moussa, I. Articles by Colombo, A.

(Circulation. 1997;96:3873-3879.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Long-term Angiographic and Clinical Outcome of Patients Undergoing Multivessel Coronary Stenting

Issam Moussa, MD; Bernhard Reimers, MD; Jeffrey Moses, MD; Carlo Di Mario, MD; Lucia Di Francesco, PhD; Massimo Ferraro, RN; ; Antonio Colombo, MD

From the Centro Cuore Columbus (B.R., C. Di M., L. Di F., M.F., A.C.), Milan, Italy, and Lenox Hill Hospital (I.M., J.M.), New York, NY.

Correspondence to Antonio Colombo, MD, Centro Cuore Columbus, Via M Buonarotti 48, 20145 Milan, Italy.

Background Randomized clinical trials have shown that multivessel coronary angioplasty is feasible and provides similar long-term survival as bypass surgery in selected patients. However, the higher need for repeat intervention, in particular, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, remains a problem. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that multivessel stenting is safe and effective in reducing the need for repeat interventions, in particular, the need for bypass surgery.

Methods and Results Between March 1993 and June 1995, 100 consecutive patients (243 lesions) had multivessel coronary stenting. High-pressure stent optimization was used in all patients. Procedural success was achieved in 97% of lesions; 2 patients (2%) required emergency bypass surgery. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 89% of patients at 5.2±2.5 months. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 22% of the lesions, but 37% of patients had 1 lesion with restenosis. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at 21±10 months: target lesion revascularization was needed in 30 patients (30%), repeat angioplasty in 28 patients (28%) and coronary bypass surgery in 2 patients (2%); the overall survival rate was 96% (2% noncardiac death).

Conclusions Multivessel coronary stenting can be performed with high success rate and low need for emergency bypass surgery. Compared with historical results with multivessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, patients who undergo multivessel stenting need less repeat interventions, in particular, less coronary bypass surgery and have similar long-term survival.

Key Words: angioplasty • revascularization • follow-up studies • stents

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Mehran, G. D. Dangas, Y. Kobayashi, A. J. Lansky, G. S. Mintz, E. D. Aymong, M. Fahy, J. W. Moses, G. W. Stone, and M. B. Leon Short- and long-term results after multivessel stenting in diabetic patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1348 - 1354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Orlic, E. Bonizzoni, G. Stankovic, F. Airoldi, A. Chieffo, N. Corvaja, G. Sangiorgi, M. Ferraro, C. Briguori, M. Montorfano, et al. Treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: immediate and mid-term results J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 7, 2004; 43(7): 1154 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gimelli, M. Glauber, A. Giorgetti, G. Sambuceti, A. L'Abbate, and P. Marzullo Revascularization of dysfunctioning myocardium: differential prognostic effects of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with three-vessel disease and mostly viable myocardium Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, September 1, 2003; 2(3): 301 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Toda, K. Mackenzie, M. R. Mehra, C. J. DiCorte, J. E. Davis, P. M. McFadden, J. L. Ochsner, C. White, and C. H. Van Meter Jr Revascularization in severe ventricular dysfunction (15% <= LVEF <= 30%): a comparison of bypass grafting and percutaneous intervention Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2082 - 2087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.V Patil, E Nikolsky, M Boulos, E Grenadier, and R Beyar Multivessel coronary artery disease: current revascularization strategies Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2001; 22(14): 1183 - 1197. [PDF]

				T. Hammoud, J.-F. Tanguay, and M. G. Bourassa Management of coronary artery disease: therapeutic options in patients with diabetes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2000; 36(2): 355 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M Gandhi and K. D Dawkins Fortnightly review: Intracoronary stents BMJ, March 6, 1999; 318(7184): 650 - 653. [Full Text]

				R. Kornowski, R. Mehran, L. F. Satler, A. D. Pichard, K. M. Kent, A. Greenberg, G. S. Mintz, M. K. Hong, and M. B. Leon Procedural results and late clinical outcomes following multivessel coronary stenting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 1999; 33(2): 420 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Elezi, A. Kastrati, F.-J. Neumann, M. Hadamitzky, J. Dirschinger, and A. Schomig Vessel Size and Long-Term Outcome After Coronary Stent Placement Circulation, November 3, 1998; 98(18): 1875 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]