This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Englund, A. Articles by Rosenqvist, M.°r. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Englund, A. Articles by Rosenqvist, M.°r.

(Circulation. 1997;95:951-954.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Head-up Tilt Test

A Nonspecific Method of Evaluating Patients With Bifascicular Block

Anders Englund, MD, PhD; Mia Fredrikson, RN; Marten Rosenqvist, MD, PhD

the Department of Cardiology (A.E., M.R.), Karolinska Hospital, and Department of Medicine (M.F.), Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Correspondence to Anders Englund, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.

Background Patients with bifascicular block have an increased risk of syncopal attacks, but the underlying mechanism often remains unclear despite an extensive diagnostic workup. The head-up tilt test has been established as an important diagnostic tool in the unmasking of vasovagal syncope in patients with unexplained syncope. Its role in the evaluation of patients with bifascicular block has not been studied.

Methods and Results A head-up tilt test, using a 60° angle of tilt for 45 minutes without pharmacological provocation, was performed in 25 patients with bifascicular block and syncope that remained unexplained after an extensive invasive and noninvasive electrophysiological investigation. As a control group, 25 subjects with bifascicular block without syncope, matched for age, sex, left ventricular function, and underlying heart disease, were included. A positive head-up tilt test was found in 7 (28%) of the syncope patients and in 8 (32%) of the control subjects (P=NS). Six patients, of whom 3 had a positive tilt test, had recurrent syncopal attacks during 32 months of follow-up. None of the control subjects had syncope during follow-up.

Conclusions This study gives rise to serious concern regarding the specificity of the head-up tilt test in patients with bifascicular block. A head-up tilt test should therefore be interpreted with caution, and its role as a diagnostic tool in this patient category remains to be established.

Key Words: syncope • tests • bundle-branch block

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Petkar and A. Fitzpatrick Tilt-table testing: transient loss of consciousness discriminator or epiphenomenon? Europace, June 1, 2008; 10(6): 747 - 750. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Donateo, M. Brignole, P. Alboni, C. Menozzi, A. Raviele, A. Del Rosso, M. Dinelli, A. Solano, N. Bottoni, and F. Croci A standardized conventional evaluation of the mechanism of syncope in patients with bundle branch block Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(4): 357 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Brignole, C. Menozzi, A. Moya, R. Garcia-Civera, L. Mont, M. Alvarez, F. Errazquin, J. Beiras, N. Bottoni, and P. Donateo Mechanism of Syncope in Patients With Bundle Branch Block and Negative Electrophysiological Test Circulation, October 23, 2001; 104(17): 2045 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sheldon and S. Rose Components of clinical trials for vasovagal syncope Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 233 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Sagrista-Sauleda, B. Romero, G. Permanyer-Miralda, A. Moya, T. Rius-Gelabert, L. Mont Girbau, and J. Soler-Soler Clinical usefulness of head-up tilt test in patients with syncope and intraventricular conduction defect Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(1): 63 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]