This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gray, R. A. Articles by Jalife, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gray, R. A. Articles by Jalife, J.

(Circulation. 1997;95:1038-1047.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Video Imaging of Atrial Defibrillation in the Sheep Heart

Richard A. Gray, PhD; Gregory Ayers, MD, PhD; Jose Jalife, MD

the Department of Pharmacology, State University of New York Health Science Center at Syracuse (R.A.G., J.J.), and InControl, Inc, Redmond, Wash (G.A.).

Correspondence to Richard A. Gray, PhD, Department of Pharmacology, SUNY Health Science Center at Syracuse, 766 Irving Ave, Syracuse, NY 13210. E-mail gray@suntan.pharm.hscsyr.edu.

Background The effects of defibrillatory shocks on the organization of atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been studied previously. In this study, we examined the events that precede, accompany, and follow the application of atrial defibrillatory shocks.

Methods and Results We used video imaging to study the sequence of activation on the surface of the atria in the Langendorff-perfused sheep heart. We recorded transmembrane potentials simultaneously from >20 000 sites on the epicardium during AF as well as during and after biphasic shocks applied by a programmable atrial defibrillator. Defibrillatory shocks (1.2±0.6 J; n=6) depolarized all epicardial regions of the atria, and asynchronous repolarization occurred. The shocks resulted in four types of responses: (1) immediate cessation of epicardial activity, (2) single postshock activation, (3) organized activation for 0.8 to 1.5 seconds followed by termination, and (4) organized activity followed by degeneration back into AF. Types 2 through 4 involved a quiescent period lasting 110±28 ms immediately after the shock, then an activation sequence similar to those observed during sinus rhythm. The first cycle length after the shock for types 3 and 4 (170±36 ms) was longer than during AF (144±33 ms). Repolarization time after a shock was significantly longer for successful compared with unsuccessful shocks.

Conclusions These results indicate that the shock depolarized the entire atrial epicardial surface, followed by a quiescent period, after which organized activation emanated from the sinoatrial pacemaker region.

Key Words: atrium • defibrillation • fibrillation • imaging

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. L. Trew, B. J. Caldwell, G. B. Sands, D. A. Hooks, D. C.-S. Tai, T. M. Austin, I. J. LeGrice, A. J. Pullan, and B. H. Smaill Cardiac electrophysiology and tissue structure: bridging the scale gap with a joint measurement and modelling paradigm Exp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 91(2): 355 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Kirchhof, G. Monnig, K. Wasmer, A. Heinecke, G. Breithardt, L. Eckardt, and D. Bocker A trial of self-adhesive patch electrodes and hand-held paddle electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (MOBIPAPA) Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2005; 26(13): 1292 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A A J Adgey and S J Walsh Theory and practice of defibrillation: (1) Atrial fibrillation and DC conversion Heart, December 1, 2004; 90(12): 1493 - 1498. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. R. Efimov, V. P. Nikolski, and G. Salama Optical Imaging of the Heart Circ. Res., July 9, 2004; 95(1): 21 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. G. Akar, B. J. Roth, and D. S. Rosenbaum Optical measurement of cell-to-cell coupling in intact heart using subthreshold electrical stimulation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): H533 - H542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C. Wang, M.-H. Lee, T. Ohara, Y. Okuyama, G. A. Fishbein, S.-F. Lin, H. S. Karagueuzian, and P.-S. Chen Optical Mapping of Ventricular Defibrillation in Isolated Swine Right Ventricles: Demonstration of a Postshock Isoelectric Window After Near-Threshold Defibrillation Shocks Circulation, July 10, 2001; 104(2): 227 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. R. Efimov, F. Aguel, Y. Cheng, B. Wollenzier, and N. Trayanova Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): H1055 - H1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Cheng, K. A. Mowrey, D. R. Van Wagoner, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov Virtual Electrode-Induced Reexcitation : A Mechanism of Defibrillation Circ. Res., November 26, 1999; 85(11): 1056 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ammer, G.u. Lehmann, A. Plewan, K. Puetter, and E. Alt Marked reduction in atrial defibrillation thresholds with repeated internal cardioversion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1569 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Banville, R. A. Gray, R. E. Ideker, and W. M. Smith Shock-Induced Figure<$DOWNLINK>-of-Eight Reentry in the Isolated Rabbit Heart Circ. Res., October 15, 1999; 85(8): 742 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Skanes, R. A. Gray, C. L. Zuur, and J. Jalife Effects of Postshock Atrial Pacing on Atrial Defibrillation Outcome in the Isolated Sheep Heart Circulation, July 7, 1998; 98(1): 64 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Gray and J. Jalife Effects of Atrial Defibrillation Shocks on the Ventricles in Isolated Sheep Hearts Circulation, April 28, 1998; 97(16): 1613 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]