Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1996;94:2856-2864

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Markowitz, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Markowitz, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, B. B.

(Circulation. 1996;94:2856-2864.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Mechanism of Ventricular Rate Control After Radiofrequency Modification of Atrioventricular Conduction in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Steven M. Markowitz, MD; Kenneth M. Stein, MD; Bruce B. Lerman, MD

the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The New York Hospital–Cornell University Medical Center, New York, NY.

Correspondence to Bruce B. Lerman, MD, Division of Cardiology, New York Hospital–Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, Starr Pavilion, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10021. E-mail blerman@mail.med.cornell.edu.

Background Modification of atrioventricular (AV) conduction during atrial fibrillation (AF) may be achieved by radiofrequency ablation in the posteroseptal region of the tricuspid annulus. We tested the hypothesis that elimination of the posterior atrionodal input rather than direct damage to the compact AV node accounts for the decrease in ventricular rate after AV nodal modification.

Methods and Results Twenty-four patients with the typical form of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) underwent selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway in the posteroseptal tricuspid annulus. AF was induced before ablation (phase 1), 30 minutes after ablation (phase 2), and during follow-up 24 hours after ablation (phase 3), both with and without concurrent infusion of isoproterenol (4 µg/min). Successful elimination of AVNRT was achieved in all patients. During phase 3, 11 patients (46%) had residual dual pathway physiology. AV nodal Wenckebach cycle length (AVNW-CL) increased progressively during each phase of the protocol (356±72 versus 371±78 ms versus 432±104 ms, P<.0001), as did the effective refractory period of the AV node (279±60 versus 304±67 ms versus 372±56 ms, P<.0001). Minimal, mean, and maximal RR intervals during AF progressively increased immediately after ablation and 24 hours later (485±88 versus 533±116 ms versus 637±142 ms for mean RR, P<.0001). The changes in AVNW-CL, AV nodal effective refractory period, and ventricular response during AF were independent of residual dual pathway physiology after ablation. Similar observations were observed during isoproterenol infusion.

Conclusions Modification of AV nodal conduction during AF by radiofrequency ablation in the posteroseptal tricuspid annulus is independent of the presence or absence of a residual slow AV nodal pathway. On the basis of these observations, the mechanism of AV nodal modification is consistent with elimination of the posterior atrionodal input.


Key Words: atrioventricular node • catheter ablation • fibrillation • tachycardia




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
P. Khairy and S. Nattel
New insights into the mechanisms and management of atrial fibrillation
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 29, 2002; 167(9): 1012 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Rokas, S. Gaitanidou, S. Chatzidou, C. Pamboucas, D. Achtipis, and S. Stamatelopoulos
Atrioventricular Node Modification in Patients With Chronic Atrial Fibrillation : Role of Morphology of RR Interval Variation
Circulation, June 19, 2001; 103(24): 2942 - 2948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. N. Mazgalev, S. Y. Ho, and R. H. Anderson
Anatomic-Electrophysiological Correlations Concerning the Pathways for Atrioventricular Conduction
Circulation, June 5, 2001; 103(22): 2660 - 2667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. C Rankin and A. J Workman
Rate control in atrial fibrillation: role of atrial inputs to the AV node
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 249 - 251.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Yamabe, I. Misumi, H. Fukushima, K. Ueno, Y. Kimura, and Y. Hokamura
Electrophysiological Delineation of the Tachycardia Circuit in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
Circulation, August 10, 1999; 100(6): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. M. Stein, J. Walden, N. Lippman, and B. B. Lerman
Ventricular response in atrial fibrillation: random or deterministic?
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 1999; 277(2): H452 - H458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. N. Mazgalev, S. Garrigue, K. A. Mowrey, Y. Yamanouchi, and P. J. Tchou
Autonomic Modification of the Atrioventricular Node During Atrial Fibrillation : Role in the Slowing of Ventricular Rate
Circulation, June 1, 1999; 99(21): 2806 - 2814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Garrigue, K. A. Mowrey, G. Fahy, P. J. Tchou, and T. N. Mazgalev
Atrioventricular Nodal Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation : Role of Atrial Input Modification
Circulation, May 4, 1999; 99(17): 2323 - 2333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. D. Krahn, G. J. Klein, R. Yee, M. N. Basta, and J. K. Lee
Progressive Anterior Ablation in the Coronary Sinus Region : Evidence to Support the Presence of a `Slow Pathway' Input in Normal Patients?
Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3477 - 3483.
[Abstract] [Full Text]