Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1996;93:1459-1463

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Furst, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Furst, J.

(Circulation. 1996;93:1459-1463.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Biological Response to Bard Clamshell Septal Occluders in the Canine Heart

Micheal A. Kuhn, MD; Larry A. Latson, MD; John P. Cheatham, MD; Bruce McManus, MD, PhD; James M. Anderson, MD, PhD; Karen L. Kilzer, RT; Joseph Furst, MS

From the Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Cleveland (Ohio) Clinic Foundation (M.A.K., L.A.L., J.F.); the Section of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center and Children's Memorial Hospital, Omaha (J.P.C., B.M., K.L.K.); and the Institute of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (J.M.A.).

Background The Clamshell Septal Occluder has been used to close various congenital heart defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term biological response to this device after placement in the canine heart. Previous in vivo studies with device placement were limited to 60 days.

Methods and Results An atrial septal defect was created in dogs by blade septostomy followed by balloon dilation. Both old and new (redesigned) devices were placed. Angiographic follow-up was performed at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 and 2 years after device placement with groups of dogs euthanitized at the same intervals. Gross and microscopic assessment was done on the explanted devices. The implants were covered at least 50% by neointima at 1 month and covered completely by 3 months. There was no thrombus formation. Areas of focal hemorrhage were evident at 1 month and were not present at 3 months. The fibrous capsule that covered the device became more densely organized and neovascularized by 2 years. A focal foreign body reaction at the device-tissue interface persisted for 2 years. There were no arm fractures with either the old or new devices in these dogs.

Conclusions The Bard Clamshell Septal Occluder is well tolerated in the canine heart for at least 2 years and elicits a normal healing process.


Key Words: catheterization • defects • pathology • heart defects, congenital • atrium




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Ritzema, I. C. Melton, A. M. Richards, I. G. Crozier, C. Frampton, R. N. Doughty, J. Whiting, S. Kar, N. Eigler, H. Krum, et al.
Direct Left Atrial Pressure Monitoring in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: Initial Experience With a New Permanent Implantable Device
Circulation, December 18, 2007; 116(25): 2952 - 2959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M. Sigler and C. Jux
Biocompatibility of septal defect closure devices
Heart, April 1, 2007; 93(4): 444 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. Jux, H. Bertram, P. Wohlsein, M. Bruegmann, and T. Paul
Interventional Atrial Septal Defect Closure Using a Totally Bioresorbable Occluder Matrix: Development and Preclinical Evaluation of the BioSTAR Device
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 161 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Pawelec-Wojtalik, J. Nozynski, M. Wojtalik, M. Piaszczynski, R. Surmacz, D. Bukowska, and W. Mrowczynski
Is device closure for direct access valved stent implantation safe?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 4 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. W. Schuchlenz, S. Mannweiler, and D. Martin
Marked foreign body reaction and thrombus formation after transcatheter closure of a patent foramen ovale
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 591 - 592.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
C. Jux, H. Bertram, P. Wohlsein, M. Brugmann, P. Wuboldt, C. Fink, T. Paul, and G. Hausdorf
Experimental ASD closure using autologous cell-seeded interventional closure devices
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 181 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. M. Zahn, N. Wilson, W. Cutright, and L. A. Latson
Development and Testing of the Helex Septal Occluder, a New Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Atrial Septal Defect Occlusion System
Circulation, August 7, 2001; 104(6): 711 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C A C Pedra, J Pihkala, K-J Lee, C Boutin, D G Nykanen, P R McLaughlin, D A Harrison, R M Freedom, and L Benson
Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects using the Cardio-Seal implant
Heart, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 320 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A B. Thomsen, M Schneider, U Baandrup, E V Stenbøg, J M Hasenkam, J P Bagger, and G Hausdorf
Animal experimental implantation of an atrial septal defect occluder system
Heart, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 606 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. W. Moore
Should Fontan FenestrationsBe Closed With Coils?
Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 247 - 248.
[Full Text]