Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;92:1994-2000

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courtois, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ludbrook, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Courtois, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ludbrook, P. A.

(Circulation. 1995;92:1994-2000.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Anatomically and Physiologically Based Reference Level for Measurement of Intracardiac Pressures

Presented in part at the Sixth International Conference of the Cardiovascular Systems Dynamics Society, San Francisco, Calif, November 19, 1994.

Michael Courtois, MA; Peter G. Fattal, MD; Sandor J. Kovács, Jr, PhD, MD; Alan J. Tiefenbrunn, MD; Philip A. Ludbrook, MB, BS, FRACP

From the Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.

Correspondence to Michael Courtois, MA, Washington University School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, 660 S Euclid, Box 8086, St Louis, MO 63110.

Background Many reference levels have been proposed for the measurement of intracardiac pressures, but none have met with universal acceptance. In the first part of our study, we evaluated 10 cardiologists' understanding of how hydrostatic pressure influences intracardiac pressures as measured with fluid-filled catheters. In the second part, we proposed and validated a new zero level (H): the uppermost blood level in the left ventricular (LV) chamber relative to the anterior chest wall for a patient in the supine position. A comparison was made of LV minimum diastolic pressure measured by reference to H versus measurements made with the zero level at midchest.

Methods and Results Using two-dimensional echocardiography, we determined H in the LVs of seven normal patients (five male, two female; age, 49±9 years) undergoing routine cardiac catheterization. H was determined from a left parasternal short-axis view and calculated as the average distance between end diastole and end systole of the endocardium of the uppermost segment of the LV anterior wall below the fourth or fifth intercostal space of the left sternal border on the anterior surface of the chest wall, with the patient in the supine position. A micromanometer/fluid-filled lumen catheter was then positioned in the LV, and we compared the micromanometer LV minimum pressure (LVPmin) obtained when the reference fluid-filled transducer was aligned at midchest with the LVPmin obtained when the reference fluid-filled transducer was aligned at H. LVPmin referenced to a midchest fluid-filled external transducer was measured as 5.1±1.6 mm Hg (range, 2.4 to 7.2 mm Hg) versus -0.6±0.6 mm Hg (range, -1.6 to 0.4 mm Hg) when referenced to H (P<.001). A significant linear relation was found to exist between patient anterior-posterior chest diameter and the magnitude of hydrostatic pressure influences related to pressure referenced at midchest (r=.88; P<.01).

Conclusions External fluid-filled transducers should be used with the goal of removing hydrostatic pressure and other influences so that the presence of subatmospheric pressure during diastole in any of the cardiac chambers is accurately measured. To achieve this goal, intracardiac pressure should be referenced to an external fluid-filled transducer aligned with the uppermost blood level in the chamber in which pressure is to be measured. The current practice of referencing the zero level of LV diastolic pressure to an external fluid-filled transducer positioned at the midchest level results in systematic overestimation due to hydrostatic effects and produces physiologically significant error in the measurement of diastolic intracardiac pressure.


Key Words: diastole • pressure • ventricles




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
U. G. McCann II, H. J. Schiller, D. E. Carney, J. Kilpatrick, L. A. Gatto, A. M. Paskanik, and G. F. Nieman
Invasive Arterial BP Monitoring in Trauma and Critical Care : Effect of Variable Transducer Level, Catheter Access, and Patient Position
Chest, October 1, 2001; 120(4): 1322 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Courtois, S. J. Kovacs, P. A. Ludbrook, S. B. Bell, and M. M. LeWinter
Diastolic Suction During Acute Coronary Occlusion • Response
Circulation, November 10, 1998; 98 (19): 2098 - 2102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. S. Mueller, K. Chatterjee, K. B. Davis, M. A. Fifer, C. Franklin, M. A. Greenberg, A. J. Labovitz, P. K. Shah, K. J. Tuman, M. H. Weil, et al.
Present use of bedside right heart catheterization in patients with cardiac disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1998; 32(3): 840 - 864.
[Full Text] [PDF]