Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;92:77-81

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niebauer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niebauer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F.

(Circulation. 1995;92:77-81.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Atrial Electrogram Characteristics in Patients With and Without Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Mark J. Niebauer, MD, PhD; Emile Daoud, MD; Brian Williamson, MD; K. Ching Man, DO; Adam Strickberger, MD; John Hummel, MD; Fred Morady, MD

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, the University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.

Correspondence to Fred Morady, MD, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B1F245, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0022.

Background Multicomponent atrial electrograms and "slow pathway potentials" are helpful in identifying target sites for radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. The purpose of this study was to compare the atrial electrograms recorded at various locations in the right atrium in patients with and without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia to assess the specificity of multicomponent atrial electrograms and possible slow pathway potentials both for the posteroseptal right atrium and for patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Methods and Results In 25 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and 23 control patients without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia or dual AV nodal physiology, atrial electrograms with an AV ratio of <=1:2 were recorded at the posteroseptal right atrium near the coronary sinus ostium and in the right atrium near the posterior, lateral, and anterior aspects of the tricuspid annulus. Attempts were made to identify broad, multicomponent, and double atrial electrograms. There were no significant differences between the patients with and without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia in the mean number of deflections in the atrial electrograms or in the mean duration of the atrial electrograms recorded at any of the atrial sites. In all patients, the number of atrial electrogram deflections and the atrial electrogram duration were significantly greater at the posteroseptal position than at the other three atrial sites. The prevalence of potentials with the appearance of slow pathway potentials in the posterior septum was similar in patients with and without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (68% and 70%, respectively). The prevalence of these potentials was 6% to 25% at the other three atrial sites (P<.005 compared with the posterior septum).

Conclusions The atrial electrogram characteristics that have been found to be useful in identifying effective posteroseptal slow pathway ablation sites in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia are equally prevalent in patients without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia or dual AV nodal physiology. Atrial electrograms in the posteroseptal area are broader and contain more deflections than at other areas in the right atrium, possibly because of conduction properties of the posterior transitional zone that are independent of the presence of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.


Key Words: atrioventricular node • tachycardia • potentials • electrocardiology • reentry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M.-H. Hsieh, S.-A. Chen, C.-T. Tai, W.-C. Yu, Y.-J. Chen, and M.-S. Chang
Absence of Junctional Rhythm During Successful Slow-Pathway Ablation in Patients With Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
Circulation, November 24, 1998; 98(21): 2296 - 2300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. G. Fisher, M. A. Pelini, and M. E. Bacon
Adjunctive Intracardiac Echocardiography to Guide Slow Pathway Ablation in Human Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia : Anatomic Insights
Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 3021 - 3029.
[Abstract] [Full Text]