| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1995;91:2140-2150.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Catheterisation Laboratory, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cardialysis (R.M.), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Correspondence to Prof P.W. Serruys, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC, Catheterisation Laboratory, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Postbus 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Background The long-term angiographic outcome after successful dilatation of coronary occlusions remains unclear. The objective of this study was to examine long-term restenosis after successful balloon dilatation of coronary occlusions at a predetermined time interval with quantitative angiography and compare this with a control population of stenoses.
Methods and Results The study population comprised 2950 patients (3583 lesions) prospectively enrolled in and successfully completing four major restenosis trials (86% quantitative angiographic follow-up). Cineangiographic films were processed and analyzed at a central core laboratory with the use of an automated interpolated edge detection technique. The study population comprised 266 occlusions (7%) defined as total when there was absent anterograde filling beyond the lesion (109 lesions) and functional (157 lesions) when faint, late anterograde opacification of the distal segment was seen in the absence of a discernible luminal continuity; 3317 lesions were defined as stenoses (93%). Restenosis was significantly higher after successful dilatation of occlusions than of stenoses. With the categorical (>50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) approach, the restenosis rate was 44.7% in occlusions compared with 34.0% in stenoses (P<.001; relative risk, 1.575; CI, 1.224 to 2.027). Similarly, the absolute loss (defined as the change in minimal lumen diameter between post coronary angioplasty and follow-up; in millimeters, mean±SD) (0.43±0.68) in occlusions was significantly higher than in stenoses (0.31±0.51, P<.001), as was the relative loss, defined as the change in minimal lumen diameter between postangioplasty and follow-up, adjusted for the vessel size (0.17±0.28 versus 0.12±0.20, P<.001). The higher restenosis rate in the occlusions group was due predominantly to an increased number of occlusions at follow-up angiography in this group (19.2% compared with 5.0% for stenoses, P<.001). Within the occlusions group, there were no significant differences in long-term outcome between total and functional occlusions (restenosis rate, 45.0% versus 44.6%; reocclusion rate, 23.9% versus 15.9%; absolute loss, 0.53±0.69 versus 0.36±0.67; relative loss, 0.21±0.28 versus 0.15±0.28; P=NS).
Conclusions These results indicate that successfully dilated coronary occlusions, both total and functional, have a higher rate of angiographic restenosis at 6 months than stenoses. This is due chiefly to a higher rate of occlusion at follow-up angiography in this group of lesions. Measures aimed at reducing restenosis after successful dilatation of coronary occlusion should be focused in this direction.
Key Words: angioplasty occlusions angiography
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. S. Werner, P. Bahrmann, O. Mutschke, U. Emig, S. Betge, M. Ferrari, and H. R. Figulla Determinants of target vessel failure in chronic total coronary occlusions after stent implantation: The influence of collateral function and coronary hemodynamics J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 16, 2003; 42(2): 219 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Olivari, P. Rubartelli, F. Piscione, F. Ettori, A. Fontanelli, L. Salemme, C. Giachero, C. Di Mario, G. Gabrielli, L. Spedicato, et al. Immediate results and one-year clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions in chronic total occlusions: data from a multicenter, prospective, observational study (TOAST-GISE) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 21, 2003; 41(10): 1672 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Werner, B. M. Richartz, O. Gastmann, M. Ferrari, and H. R. Figulla Immediate Changes of Collateral Function After Successful Recanalization of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions Circulation, December 12, 2000; 102(24): 2959 - 2965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Al Suwaidi, P. B. Berger, and D. R. Holmes Jr Coronary Artery Stents JAMA, October 11, 2000; 284(14): 1828 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gruberg, R. Mehran, G. Dangas, M. K. Hong, G. S. Mintz, R. Kornowski, A. J. Lansky, K. M. Kent, A. D. Pichard, L. F. Satler, et al. Effect of plaque debulking and stenting on short- and long-term outcomes after revascularization of chronic total occlusions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 151 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S Oemar Is interleukin-1 beta a triggering factor for restenosis? Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 1999; 44(1): 17 - 19. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schofer, T. Rau, M. Schluter, and D.G. Mathey Restenosis after stenting of matched occluded and non-occluded coronary arteries. Should there be a difference? Eur. Heart J., August 2, 1999; 20(16): 1175 - 1181. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Van Belle, K. Abolmaali, C. Bauters, E. P. McFadden, J.-M. Lablanche, and M. E. Bertrand Restenosis, late vessel occlusion and left ventricular function six months after balloon angioplasty in diabetic patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1999; 34(2): 476 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Buller, V. Dzavik, R. G. Carere, G. B. J. Mancini, G. Barbeau, C. Lazzam, T. J. Anderson, M. L. Knudtson, J.-F. Marquis, T. Suzuki, et al. Primary Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty in Occluded Coronary Arteries : The Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA) Circulation, July 20, 1999; 100(3): 236 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Sirnes, S. Golf, Y. Myreng, P. Molstad, P. Albertsson, A. Mangschau, K. Endresen, and J. Kjekshus Sustained benefit of stenting chronic coronary occlusion: long-term clinical follow-up of the Stenting in Chronic Coronary Occlusion (SICCO) study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 305 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rubartelli, L. Niccoli, E. Verna, C. Giachero, M. Zimarino, A. Fontanelli, C. Vassanelli, L. Campolo, E. Martuscelli, G. Tommasini, et al. Stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty in chronic coronary occlusions: results from the GISSOC trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1998; 32(1): 90 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, S. Elezi, H. Schuhlen, M. Wilhelm, and J. Dirschinger Interlesion Dependence of the Risk for Restenosis in Patients With Coronary Stent Placement in Multiple Lesions Circulation, June 23, 1998; 97(24): 2396 - 2401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Violaris, R. Melkert, J.-P. R. Herrman, and P. W. Serruys Role of Angiographically Identifiable Thrombus on Long-term Luminal Renarrowing After Coronary Angioplasty : A Quantitative Angiographic Analysis Circulation, March 1, 1996; 93(5): 889 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. King III Total Occlusions : The View of an Optimist Circulation, April 15, 1995; 91(8): 2113 - 2114. [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |