This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swerdlow, C. D. Articles by Raissi, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Swerdlow, C. D. Articles by Raissi, S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Pacemakers and Implantable Defibrillators

Circulation, Vol 90, 1840-1846, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Effect of capacitor size and pathway resistance on defibrillation threshold for implantable defibrillators

CD Swerdlow, RM Kass, PS Chen, C Hwang and S Raissi
Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif.

BACKGROUND: The time constant of truncated exponential pulses used with implantable defibrillators is determined by the output capacitor size and defibrillation pathway resistance. The optimal capacitor size is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study compared defibrillation threshold (DFT) for standard 120-microF capacitors (DFT120) and smaller 60-microF capacitors (DFT60) at implantation of cardioverter- defibrillators in 67 patients using epicardial electrodes (15 patients) or one of four transvenous electrode configurations (52 patients). Paired comparisons of DFT60 and DFT120 were made for 44 defibrillation pathways using monophasic pulses and for 53 pathways using biphasic pulses. Truncated exponential pulses with 65% tilt were used. Pooled data from all electrode configurations showed a significant inverse correlation between pathway resistance and the ratio of stored energy DFT60 to DFT120 (monophasic pulses: r = .75, P = .0001; biphasic pulses: r = .68, P = .0001). Data from all electrode configurations formed a continuum with 120-microF capacitors superior for low- resistance pathways and 60-microF capacitors superior for high- resistance pathways. For pathways with resistance < or = 40 omega, the modest advantage of 120-microF capacitors applied primarily to pathways with low DFTs: 8.2 +/- 6.1 versus 9.6 +/- 5.4 J (P = .001) for monophasic pulses and 4.1 +/- 2.8 versus 5.1 +/- 3.1 J (P < .02) for biphasic pulses. The greater advantage of 60-microF capacitors for pathways with resistance > or = 61 omega applied to pathways with higher DFTs: 12.4 +/- 4.3 versus 23.1 +/- 6.4 J (P = .0001) for monophasic pulses and 8.5 +/- 4.9 versus 12.5 +/- 6.4 J (P = .0001) for biphasic pulses. For pathways using monophasic 120-microF pulses versus 95% for 60-microF pulses. Similarly, the DFT was < or = 10 J for 48% of pathways using biphasic 120-microF capacitors versus 83% for 60-microF pulses. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with conventional 120-microF capacitors, 60-microF capacitors had clinically insignificant higher DFTs for low-resistance pathways and clinically important lower DFTs for high-resistance pathways. Optimal capacitance is inversely related to pathway resistance for clinical defibrillation pathways and waveforms.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Irnich Parameters characterizing implantable defibrillator output: a proposal Europace, September 1, 2007; 9(9): 711 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Ideker, A. E. Epstein, and G. P. Walcott Is there an optimal capacitance for defibrillation? Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(4): 275 - 277. [PDF]

				J. Brugada, B. Herse, B. Sandsted, U. Michel, B. D. Schubert, and S. J. Hahn Clinical evaluation of defibrillation efficacy with a new single-capacitor biphasic waveform in patients undergoing implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(4): 278 - 284. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. N. Schauerte, K. Ziegert, M. Waldmann, F. A. Schondube, F. Birkenhauer, K. Mischke, M. Grossmann, P. Hanrath, and C. Stellbrink Effect of Biphasic Shock Duration on Defibrillation Threshold With Different Electrode Configurations and Phase 2 Capacitances : Prediction by Upper-Limit-of-Vulnerability Determination Circulation, March 23, 1999; 99(11): 1516 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. S. Cooper, V. J. Plumb, A. E. Epstein, G. N. Kay, and R. E. Ideker Marked Reduction in Internal Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds With Dual-Current Pathways and Sequential Shocks in Humans Circulation, June 30, 1998; 97(25): 2527 - 2535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Schauerte, F. A. Schondube, M. Grossmann, H. Dorge, F. Stein, B. Dohmen, A. Moumen, K. Erena, B. J. Messmer, P. Hanrath, et al. Influence of Phase Duration of Biphasic Waveforms on Defibrillation Energy Requirements With a 70-µF Capacitance Circulation, May 26, 1998; 97(20): 2073 - 2078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Swerdlow, J. E. Brewer, R. M. Kass, and M. W. Kroll Application of Models of Defibrillation to Human Defibrillation Data : Implications for Optimizing Implantable Defibrillator Capacitance Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 2813 - 2822. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. D. Swerdlow, C. T. Peter, R. M. Kass, E. S. Gang, W. J. Mandel, C. Hwang, D. J. Martin, and P.-S. Chen Programming of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators on the Basis of the Upper Limit of Vulnerability Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1497 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. D. Swerdlow, W. Fan, and J. E. Brewer Charge-Burping Theory Correctly Predicts Optimal Ratios of Phase Duration for Biphasic Defibrillation Waveforms Circulation, November 1, 1996; 94(9): 2278 - 2284. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Y. Yamanouchi, K. A. Mowrey, G. R. Nadzam, D. G. Hills, M. W. Kroll, J. E. Brewer, A. M. Donohoo, B. L. Wilkoff, and P. J. Tchou Large Change in Voltage at Phase Reversal Improves Biphasic Defibrillation Thresholds: Parallel-Series Mode Switching Circulation, October 1, 1996; 94(7): 1768 - 1773. [Abstract] [Full Text]