This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kilner, P. J. Articles by Longmore, D. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kilner, P. J. Articles by Longmore, D. B.

Circulation, Vol 87, 1239-1248, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis

PJ Kilner, CC Manzara, RH Mohiaddin, DJ Pennell, MG Sutton, DN Firmin, SR Underwood and DB Longmore
Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton National Heart and Lung Hospital, London, UK.

BACKGROUND. Magnetic resonance (MR) phase-shift velocity mapping is an established method for measurement of nonturbulent intravascular flow. Shortening the echo time of the MR sequence to 3.6 msec allowed application of the technique to turbulent jet flow. The objective of this study was validation of MR jet velocity mapping in patients with cardiac valve stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS. We used a 0.5-T Picker MR machine to measure peak poststenotic jet velocity in 15 consecutive patients recruited with known valve disease (six mitral stenosis, three of these restudied after valvoplasty, and 11 aortic stenosis). On the same day as the MR study, these patients underwent independent Doppler echocardiographic measurement of peak jet velocity. The results of 10 further MR investigations of aortic stenosis are also reported and compared with Doppler studies performed within 6 months. Of the 29 MR studies, 28 (97%) produced interpretable velocity maps, the one failure being attributed to misplacement of the imaging slice in a case of severe aortic stenosis. Agreement between MR and Doppler measurements of peak jet velocity in the recruited group was as follows: n = 18; range, 1.4-6.1 m/sec; mean, 3 m/sec; mean of differences (MR-Doppler), 0.23 m/sec; standard deviation of differences, 0.49 m/sec. CONCLUSIONS. In vivo MR peak jet velocity measurements agree well with those made by Doppler ultrasound. The technique, which is not subject to restricted windows of access and has potential for further refinements, could contribute to improved evaluation of stenoses, especially at locations where ultrasonic access is limited.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. J. Pennell, U. P. Sechtem, C. B. Higgins, W. J. Manning, G. M. Pohost, F. E. Rademakers, A. C. van Rossum, L. J. Shaw, and E. K. Yucel Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1940 - 1965. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Lin, P. A. Brown, M. P. Watkins, T. A. Williams, K. A. Lehr, W. Liu, G. M. Lanza, S. A. Wickline, and S. D. Caruthers Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with Doppler ultrasound J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2004; 44(1): 133 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Caruthers, S. J. Lin, P. Brown, M. P. Watkins, T. A. Williams, K. A. Lehr, and S. A. Wickline Practical Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Quantification of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Comparison With Echocardiography Circulation, November 4, 2003; 108(18): 2236 - 2243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. John, T. Dill, R. R. Brandt, M. Rau, W. Ricken, G. Bachmann, and C. W. Hamm Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: How does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 6, 2003; 42(3): 519 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Glockner, D. L Johnston, and K. P McGee Evaluation of Cardiac Valvular Disease with MR Imaging: Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques RadioGraphics, January 1, 2003; 23(1): e9 - e9. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. Didier, O. Ratib, R. Lerch, and B. Friedli Detection and Quantification of Valvular Heart Disease with Dynamic Cardiac MR Imaging RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1279 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Cheitlin, J. S. Alpert, W. F. Armstrong, G. P. Aurigemma, G. A. Beller, F. Z. Bierman, T. W. Davidson, J. L. Davis, P. S. Douglas, L. D. Gillam, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1686 - 1744. [Full Text]