Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1992;86:1206-1216

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Plumb, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Plumb, V. J.

Circulation, Vol 86, 1206-1216, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with high defibrillation thresholds. A multicenter study

AE Epstein, KA Ellenbogen, KA Kirk, GN Kay, SM Dailey and VJ Plumb
Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294.

BACKGROUND. Successful defibrillation by an implantable cardioverter- defibrillator (ICD) depends on its ability to deliver shocks that exceed the defibrillation threshold. This study was designed to identify clinical characteristics that may predict the finding of an elevated defibrillation threshold and to describe the outcome of patients with high defibrillation thresholds. METHODS AND RESULTS. The records of 1,946 patients from 12 centers were screened to identify 90 patients (4.6%) with a defibrillation threshold greater than or equal to 25 J. Excluding three patients who received ICDs that delivered greater than 30 J, there were 81 men and six women with a mean age of 59.5 +/- 10.1 years, a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.32 +/- 0.14, and a 76% prevalence of coronary artery disease. Sixty-one patients (70%) were receiving antiarrhythmic drugs, and 45 (52%) were receiving amiodarone. Seventy-one patients (82%) received an ICD. Death occurred in 27 patients--19 of the 71 (27%) with an ICD (eight arrhythmic), and eight of the 16 (50%) without an ICD (four arrhythmic). Actuarial survival for all patients at 5 years was 67%. Actuarial survival rates at 2 years for patients with and without an ICD were 81% and 36%, respectively (p = 0.0024). Actuarial survival at 5 years for the ICD patients was 73%; no patient without an ICD has lived longer than 32 months. Actuarial survival free of arrhythmic death in the ICD patients at 5 years was 84%. Although the only variable to predict survival was ICD implantation (p = 0.003), it is entirely possible that in this retrospective analysis, clinical selection decisions to implant or to not implant an ICD differentiated patients destined to have better or worse outcomes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. Antiarrhythmic drug use may be causally related to the finding of an elevated defibrillation threshold. When patients with high defibrillation thresholds receive an ICD, arrhythmic death remains an important risk (42% of deaths in these patients were arrhythmia related, with 16% actuarial incidence at 5 years). Vigorous testing to optimize patch location can potentially benefit patients by enhancing the margin of safety for effective defibrillation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
T. Schefer, T. Wolber, C. Binggeli, J. Holzmeister, C. Brunckhorst, and F. Duru
Long-term predictors of mortality in ICD patients with non-ischaemic cardiac disease: impact of renal function
Europace, September 1, 2008; 10(9): 1052 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. A. Blatt, J. E. Poole, G. W. Johnson, D. J. Callans, M. H. Raitt, R. K. Reddy, F. E. Marchlinski, R. Yee, T. Guarnieri, M. Talajic, et al.
No Benefit From Defibrillation Threshold Testing in the SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 12, 2008; 52(7): 551 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Sacher, V. Probst, Y. Iesaka, P. Jacon, J. Laborderie, F. Mizon-Gerard, P. Mabo, S. Reuter, D. Lamaison, Y. Takahashi, et al.
Outcome After Implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Brugada Syndrome: A Multicenter Study
Circulation, November 28, 2006; 114(22): 2317 - 2324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. A. Wood and K. A. Ellenbogen
Follow-Up Defibrillator Testing for Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Probability and Uncertainty
Circulation, July 11, 2006; 114(2): 98 - 100.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. H. Hohnloser, P. Dorian, R. Roberts, M. Gent, C. W. Israel, E. Fain, J. Champagne, and S. J. Connolly
Effect of Amiodarone and Sotalol on Ventricular Defibrillation Threshold: The Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) Trial
Circulation, July 11, 2006; 114(2): 104 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
D. A.M.J. Theuns, T. Szili-Torok, and L. J. Jordaens
Defibrillation efficacy testing: Long-term follow-up and mortality
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(6): 509 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. A. Strickberger and G. J. Klein
Is defibrillation testing required for defibrillator implantation?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2004; 44(1): 88 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. J. Rashba, M. R. Olsovsky, S. R. Shorofsky, M. M. Kirk, R. W. Peters, and M. R. Gold
Temporal decline in defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral lead system
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1150 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. Oral, J. J. Souza, G. F. Michaud, B. P. Knight, R. Goyal, S. A. Strickberger, and F. Morady
Facilitating Transthoracic Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation with Ibutilide Pretreatment
N. Engl. J. Med., June 17, 1999; 340(24): 1849 - 1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Windecker, R. E. Ideker, V. J. Plumb, G. N. Kay, G. P. Walcott, and A. E. Epstein
The influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. A. Strickberger, E. G. Daoud, T. Davidson, R. Weiss, F. Bogun, B. P. Knight, M. Bahu, R. Goyal, K. C. Man, and F. Morady
Probability of Successful Defibrillation at Multiples of the Defibrillation Energy Requirement in Patients With an Implantable Defibrillator
Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1217 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
A. P. Winecoff, J. J. Sims, M. L. Markel, and M. R. Ujhelyi
Pinacidil's Effects on Defibrillation Outcomes: Role of Increased Potassium Conductance Via the KATP Channel
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1997; 2(3): 171 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. U. Alt, P. C. Fotuhi, R. L. Callihan, E. Mestre, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Endocardial Carbon-Braid Electrodes : A New Concept for Lower Defibrillation Thresholds
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1627 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. R. Ujhelyi, M. Schur, T. Frede, M. Gabel, and M. L. Markel
Differential Effects of Lidocaine on Defibrillation Threshold With Monophasic Versus Biphasic Shock Waveforms
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1644 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
N. K. Wenger, L. Speroff, and B. Packard
Cardiovascular Health and Disease in Women
N. Engl. J. Med., July 22, 1993; 329(4): 247 - 256.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. R. Gold, S. Higgins, R. Klein, F. R. Gilliam, H. Kopelman, S. Hessen, J. Payne, S. A. Strickberger, D. Breiter, and S. Hahn
Efficacy and Temporal Stability of Reduced Safety Margins for Ventricular Defibrillation: Primary Results From the Low Energy Safety Study (LESS)
Circulation, April 30, 2002; 105(17): 2043 - 2048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]