Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1992;85:596-605

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zehender, M.
Right arrow Articles by Just, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zehender, M.
Right arrow Articles by Just, H.

Circulation, Vol 85, 596-605, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Prevalence, circumstances, mechanisms, and risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in unipolar single-chamber ventricular pacing

M Zehender, C Buchner, T Meinertz and H Just
Innere Medizin III, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitatsklinik Freiburg, FRG.

BACKGROUND. Permanent cardiac pacing is well established for the improvement of prognosis and quality of life in patients with severe bradycardia. However, sudden cardiac death still remains an unresolved problem, as it occurs in approximately 20-30% of paced patients. This 2- year follow-up study was directed at prospectively assessing prevalence, circumstances, and mechanisms of sudden death in 2,021 permanently paced patients. METHODS AND RESULTS. During the observation period, 220 patients (11%) died (mean pacing interval, 50.5 +/- 7 months). Lethal cerebrovascular events in 66 of 220 patients (30%) and sudden death in 49 of 220 patients (23%) were the two most frequently reported modes of death. Nonsudden (first year, 20%; subsequent years, 6.9%; p less than 0.01) and sudden death mortality rate (4% versus 1.8%, p less than 0.05) were highest during the first year. Mortality was unrelated to the patient's activity status at the time of death. Sudden cardiac death occurred more often in male patients (increased risk, 1.7 versus female patients; p less than 0.001) and patients younger than 60 years of age (5.2 versus patients older than 60 years, p less than 0.001). Patients with severe bradycardia (sudden death rate, 28%), severe atrioventricular block (25%), or atrial fibrillation with low ventricular rate (25%) before pacemaker implantation were more likely to suffer from sudden cardiac death than patients with previous syncopal attacks (sudden death rate, 15%) or sick sinus syndrome (17%). The highest incidence of sudden death was observed in patients with bifascicular and trifascicular bundle branch block. In this group, 35% of patients died suddenly during the follow-up period compared with 18% of patients without bundle branch block. In a subsequent study in 90 consecutive patients with various types of bundle branch block, undersensing of up to 13% of ectopic ventricular beats occurred in patients with bifascicular block. Pacing-induced tachyarrhythmias and ventricular fibrillation were documented in 10% of undersensed ectopic ventricular beats as well as in the setting of atrial fibrillation associated with ventricular arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS. Young age, male sex, and a severely diseased heart indicated by the presence of bifascicular and trifascicular bundle branch block are the strongest predictive clinical parameters for sudden cardiac death, especially in the first year after pacemaker implantation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. Nagele, S. Hashagen, M. Azizi, S. Behrens, and M.A. Castel
Analysis of terminal arrhythmias stored in the memory of pacemakers from patients dying suddenly
Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 380 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Eriksson, L. Wilhelmsen, and A. Rosengren
Bundle-branch block in middle-aged men: risk of complications and death over 28 years: The Primary Prevention Study in Goteborg, Sweden
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2005; 26(21): 2300 - 2306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. Himmrich, O. Przibille, C. Zellerhoff, A. Liebrich, S. Rosocha, K. Andreas, D. Nebeling, B. Omogbehin, and J. Meyer
Proarrhythmic Effect of Pacemaker Stimulation in Patients With Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Circulation, July 15, 2003; 108(2): 192 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M E Marketou, E N Simantirakis, V K Prassopoulos, S I Chrysostomakis, A A Velidaki, N S Karkavitsas, and P E Vardas
Assessment of myocardial adrenergic innervation in patients with sick sinus syndrome: effect of asynchronous ventricular activation from ventricular apical stimulation
Heart, September 1, 2002; 88(3): 255 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S.G. Priori, E. Aliot, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, L. Bossaert, G. Breithardt, P. Brugada, A.J. Camm, R. Cappato, S.M. Cobbe, C. Di Mario, et al.
Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2001; 22(16): 1374 - 1450.
[PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
B. Brembilla-Perrot, C. Suty-Selton, P. Houriez, O. Claudon, D. Beurrier, and A. T. de la Chaise
Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction
Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 187 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]