Circulation, Vol 85, 565-573, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association
H Calkins, YN Kim, S Schmaltz, J Sousa, R el-Atassi, A Leon, A Kadish, JJ Langberg and F Morady
BACKGROUND. Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular (AV)
connections using radiofrequency current has been demonstrated to be
effective in the majority of patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White
syndrome or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia involving a concealed
accessory AV connection. However, electrogram criteria have not been
established to guide attempts at radiofrequency catheter ablation. METHODS
AND RESULTS. The characteristics of local electrograms recorded at
successful and unsuccessful sites of radiofrequency catheter ablation were
determined in 132 patients. Electrograms recorded at a total of 438 sites
were analyzed: 338 recorded during ablation of 90 manifest accessory AV
connections and 100 recorded during ablation of 44 concealed accessory AV
connections. During ablation of manifest accessory AV connections, the
independent predictors of outcome were electrogram stability (p less than
0.001), the interval between activation of the ventricular electrogram and
onset of the QRS complex (p less than 0.001), and the presence of an
accessory AV connection potential (p less than 0.001). Radiofrequency
energy delivery at sites demonstrating stable electrograms, a probable or
possible accessory AV connection potential, and activation of the local
ventrical electrogram before the onset of the QRS complex had a 57%
probability of success compared with a 3% probability of success at sites
without these features. During ablation of concealed accessory AV
connections, the independent predictors of outcome were electrogram
stability (p = 0.02), the presence of an accessory AV connection potential
(p = 0.05), and the presence of retrograde continuous electrical activity
(p = 0.04). Sites demonstrating a stable local electrogram, an accessory AV
connection potential, and retrograde continuous electrical activity had an
82% probability of success compared with only a 5% probability of success
at sites demonstrating none of these features. CONCLUSIONS. The local
electrogram parameters of greatest importance in predicting the success or
failure of radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory AV connections are
electrogram stability, the presence of an accessory AV connection
potential, and the timing of ventricular activation relative to the QRS
complex (for manifest accessory AV connections) or retrograde continuous
electrical activity (for concealed accessory AV connections). Awareness of
these variables during attempts at radiofrequency catheter ablation of
accessory AV connections may minimize the number of unnecessary
applications of radiofrequency energy.
ARTICLES
Electrogram criteria for identification of appropriate target sites for radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0022.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Nakagawa and W. M. Jackman Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia Circulation, November 20, 2007; 116(21): 2465 - 2478. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.S. Gill How to perform pulmonary vein isolation Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(2): 83 - 91. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Otomo, M. D. Gonzalez, K. J. Beckman, H. Nakagawa, A. E. Becker, N. Shah, K. Matsudaira, Z. Wang, R. Lazzara, and W. M. Jackman Reversing the Direction of Paced Ventricular and Atrial Wavefronts Reveals an Oblique Course in Accessory AV Pathways and Improves Localization for Catheter Ablation Circulation, July 31, 2001; 104(5): 550 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Calkins ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias Heart, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 594 - 600. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kawamura, N. Sato, N. Sakamoto, A. Yokoyama, S. Kamada, H. Kakuchi, Y. Iida, and K. Kikuchi Characteristics of Intracardiac Potentials at Successful Ablation Sites in Concealed Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome Angiology, August 1, 1999; 50(8): 665 - 670. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-C. Ueng, S.-A. Chen, C.-E. Chiang, C.-C. Cheng, T.-J. Wu, C.-T. Tai, S.-H. Lee, C.-W. Chiou, C.-Y. Chen, Z.-C. Wen, et al. Paradox of Accessory Pathway Block After Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome Angiology, November 1, 1996; 47(11): 1061 - 1071. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1992 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |