Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1992;85:565-573

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calkins, H.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calkins, H.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F.

Circulation, Vol 85, 565-573, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Electrogram criteria for identification of appropriate target sites for radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections

H Calkins, YN Kim, S Schmaltz, J Sousa, R el-Atassi, A Leon, A Kadish, JJ Langberg and F Morady
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0022.

BACKGROUND. Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular (AV) connections using radiofrequency current has been demonstrated to be effective in the majority of patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia involving a concealed accessory AV connection. However, electrogram criteria have not been established to guide attempts at radiofrequency catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS. The characteristics of local electrograms recorded at successful and unsuccessful sites of radiofrequency catheter ablation were determined in 132 patients. Electrograms recorded at a total of 438 sites were analyzed: 338 recorded during ablation of 90 manifest accessory AV connections and 100 recorded during ablation of 44 concealed accessory AV connections. During ablation of manifest accessory AV connections, the independent predictors of outcome were electrogram stability (p less than 0.001), the interval between activation of the ventricular electrogram and onset of the QRS complex (p less than 0.001), and the presence of an accessory AV connection potential (p less than 0.001). Radiofrequency energy delivery at sites demonstrating stable electrograms, a probable or possible accessory AV connection potential, and activation of the local ventrical electrogram before the onset of the QRS complex had a 57% probability of success compared with a 3% probability of success at sites without these features. During ablation of concealed accessory AV connections, the independent predictors of outcome were electrogram stability (p = 0.02), the presence of an accessory AV connection potential (p = 0.05), and the presence of retrograde continuous electrical activity (p = 0.04). Sites demonstrating a stable local electrogram, an accessory AV connection potential, and retrograde continuous electrical activity had an 82% probability of success compared with only a 5% probability of success at sites demonstrating none of these features. CONCLUSIONS. The local electrogram parameters of greatest importance in predicting the success or failure of radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory AV connections are electrogram stability, the presence of an accessory AV connection potential, and the timing of ventricular activation relative to the QRS complex (for manifest accessory AV connections) or retrograde continuous electrical activity (for concealed accessory AV connections). Awareness of these variables during attempts at radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory AV connections may minimize the number of unnecessary applications of radiofrequency energy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Nakagawa and W. M. Jackman
Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia
Circulation, November 20, 2007; 116(21): 2465 - 2478.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J.S. Gill
How to perform pulmonary vein isolation
Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(2): 83 - 91.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Otomo, M. D. Gonzalez, K. J. Beckman, H. Nakagawa, A. E. Becker, N. Shah, K. Matsudaira, Z. Wang, R. Lazzara, and W. M. Jackman
Reversing the Direction of Paced Ventricular and Atrial Wavefronts Reveals an Oblique Course in Accessory AV Pathways and Improves Localization for Catheter Ablation
Circulation, July 31, 2001; 104(5): 550 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
H. Calkins
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias
Heart, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 594 - 600.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
Y. Kawamura, N. Sato, N. Sakamoto, A. Yokoyama, S. Kamada, H. Kakuchi, Y. Iida, and K. Kikuchi
Characteristics of Intracardiac Potentials at Successful Ablation Sites in Concealed Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome
Angiology, August 1, 1999; 50(8): 665 - 670.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K.-C. Ueng, S.-A. Chen, C.-E. Chiang, C.-C. Cheng, T.-J. Wu, C.-T. Tai, S.-H. Lee, C.-W. Chiou, C.-Y. Chen, Z.-C. Wen, et al.
Paradox of Accessory Pathway Block After Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome
Angiology, November 1, 1996; 47(11): 1061 - 1071.
[Abstract] [PDF]