Circulation, Vol 83, 294-303, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association
CW Christensen, LB Rosen, RA Gal, M Haseeb, TA Lassar and SC Port
To evaluate coronary flow reserve during cardiac catheterization,
intracoronary adenosine and papaverine have been used in the clinical
setting. Although papaverine maximizes coronary blood flow, it induces
several toxic side effects that reduce its desirability as a coronary
dilator. This investigation was designed to compare the subselective
intracoronary administration of papaverine with that of adenosine in an
animal model. In dogs (n = 34), we studied the effects of each agent on
hemodynamics, regional myocardial blood flow, contractility
(sonomicrometric and echocardiographic), metabolism (coronary arterial and
venous lactate and tissue high-energy phosphates), and electrocardiographic
(ST and QT intervals) parameters. Barbiturate and morphine
anesthesia/analgesia was induced, and a left thoracotomy was performed. An
arterial shunt was created from the left carotid artery to the left
anterior descending coronary artery. Two separate groups were studied:
group 1 (n = 16) for regional myocardial blood flow and mechanical function
and group 2 (n = 18) for biochemical measurements. Adenosine (67 +/- 2
micrograms/min) or papaverine (6 +/- 1 mg/min) was infused into the
coronary shunt at a rate of 0.5 + 0.1 ml/min for a maximum duration of 3.5
minutes. Regional myocardial blood flows were determined at control
(predrug) and maximal coronary flow using radiolabeled microspheres. All
hemodynamic, wall motion, biochemical, and electrocardiographic parameters
were also measured at these times. Both drugs produced comparable increases
in total and regional coronary blood flows (adenosine, 1.21 +/- 0.15 to
4.83 +/- 0.36 ml/min/g; papaverine, 1.21 +/- 0.05 to 4.89 +/- 0.28
ml/min/g) upon infusion into the left anterior descending coronary artery.
Papaverine produced significant (p less than 0.05) changes in
subendocardial ST segment electrocardiogram (-2.5 mm), QT prolongation (8
+/- 2%), myocardial creatine phosphate (47% decrease), and coronary sinus
serum lactate (277% increase) compared with control. In addition,
intracoronary papaverine induced an abnormal contractile pattern. No
significant changes in any of these parameters (i.e., ST segment, QT
prolongation, myocardial creatine phosphate level, or lactate level) were
observed with intracoronary adenosine infusions. We conclude that
intracoronary adenosine is comparable to papaverine for maximizing coronary
blood flow without the deleterious properties observed with intracoronary
papaverine.
ARTICLES
Coronary vasodilator reserve. Comparison of the effects of papaverine and adenosine on coronary flow, ventricular function, and myocardial metabolism
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Sinai Samaritan Medical Center, Milwaukee 53233.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Billinger, C. Seiler, M. Fleisch, F. R. Eberli, B. Meier, and O. M. Hess Do beta-adrenergic blocking agents increase coronary flow reserve? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1866 - 1871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L'Abbate, G. Sambuceti, S. Haunso, and J. Schneider-Eicke Methods for evaluating coronary microvasculature in humans Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1300 - 1313. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Schwanke, H. Strauss, G. Arnold, and J. D. Schipke Analysis of respiratory water---a new method for evaluation of myocardial energy metabolism J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1996; 81(5): 2115 - 2122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Rossen, Y. Agmon, R. Gorlin, E.C. Abbott, K. Egashira, and A. Takeshita Endothelial Dysfunction in Microvascular Angina N. Engl. J. Med., December 2, 1993; 329(23): 1739 - 1740. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Egashira, T. Inou, Y. Hirooka, A. Yamada, Y. Urabe, and A. Takeshita Evidence of Impaired Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasodilatation in Patients with Angina Pectoris and Normal Coronary Angiograms N. Engl. J. Med., June 10, 1993; 328(23): 1659 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1991 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |