Circulation, Vol 83, 279-293, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association
R Lemery, TK Leung, E Lavallee, A Girard, M Talajic, D Roy and M Montpetit
DC shocks within the coronary sinus have been abandoned because of the risk
of cardiac rupture and tamponade. Catheter ablation using DC energy to
electrodes straddling the ostium of the coronary sinus, when used
clinically, has been reported to result in cardiac tamponade in as many as
16% of patients. A new system of energy delivery maximizes voltage while
decreasing the undesirable effects caused by barotrauma. This system
includes 1) a low-energy ablation power supply with a brief time-constant
capacitive discharge that delivers up to 40 J and 3,000 V and 2) a
low-energy ablation catheter with a contoured distal electrode. We
performed in vitro and in vivo studies of this new system and compared
arcing shocks with nonarcing shocks. Ablations were performed using
unipolar distal shocks (D) and unipolar shocks to both electrodes made
electrically common (P-D). In vitro studies were done in a large tank
filled with physiological saline while recording voltage, current, and
pressure. High-speed cinematography (32,000 frames/sec) of shocks of 10-40
J permitted detailed analysis of the vapor globe. Anodal shocks of less
than 20 J showed no arcing or only minimal vapor globe formation. For D and
P-D anodal shocks of 40 J, the diameters of the vapor globe were 31 and 22
mm, respectively, corresponding to pressure recordings of 11 and 4.9 atm.
The pressure rise lasted less than 50 mu sec. In vivo studies involved 18
dogs that received nonarcing shocks (one to six shocks of 15 J) and 18 dogs
that received arcing shocks (one to three shocks of 40 J). Each group was
divided between D and P-D shocks; catheter ablation was performed at a mean
+/- SEM distance of 2.94 +/- 0.92 cm within the coronary sinus. All dogs
tolerated the procedure without cardiac rupture or tamponade. When killed
2-4 days later, the dogs had edema and hyperemia or hemorrhage in the area
of the coronary sinus. We compared the effects of multiple (three to six)
nonarcing shocks with the effects of one to three arcing shocks. Disruption
or rupture of the coronary sinus within the epicardial fat space occurred
in two of 12 dogs (17%) with multiple nonarcing shocks but in 13 of 18 dogs
(72%) with arcing shocks (p less than 0.003). Occlusion of the coronary
sinus occurred in two of 12 dogs (17%) with multiple nonarcing shocks and
in nine of 18 dogs (50%) with arcing shocks (p less than 0.06).(ABSTRACT
TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
ARTICLES
In vitro and in vivo effects within the coronary sinus of nonarcing and arcing shocks using a new system of low-energy DC ablation
Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Canada.
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1991 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |