This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shanes, J. G. Articles by Furner, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shanes, J. G. Articles by Furner, S.

Circulation, Vol 75, 401-405, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Interobserver variability in the pathologic interpretation of endomyocardial biopsy results

JG Shanes, J Ghali, ME Billingham, VJ Ferrans, JJ Fenoglio, WD Edwards, CC Tsai, JE Saffitz, J Isner and S Furner

Controversy exists over the role of endomyocardial biopsy in evaluating patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, particularly in detecting myocarditis and in assessing prognosis. Interobserver variability, if high, could explain conflicting reports. To assess this possibility, we submitted biopsy specimens from 16 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy to seven cardiac pathologists. The same slides were independently reviewed by each and assessed for fibrosis, hypertrophy, nuclear changes on a 0 to 3+ scale, mean lymphocyte count per high-power field, and myocarditis. The prevalance of significant fibrosis ranged from 25% to 69%, hypertrophy from 19% to 88%, nuclear changes from 31% to 94%, and abnormal lymphocyte count from 0 to 38%. One or more pathologists diagnosed definite or possible myocarditis in 11 of the 16 patients. Of these 11 patients, three pathologists agreed about three and two pathologists agreed about five. Myocarditis was diagnosed by a single pathologist in three cases. We conclude that interobserver variability is high in interpreting biopsy specimens from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and that quantitative and standardized methods are needed to increase diagnostic consistency.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. G. Friedrich, U. Sechtem, J. Schulz-Menger, G. Holmvang, P. Alakija, L. T. Cooper, J. A. White, H. Abdel-Aty, M. Gutberlet, S. Prasad, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 28, 2009; 53(17): 1475 - 1487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Nazarian, D. A. Bluemke, and H. R. Halperin Applications of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Electrophysiology Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, February 1, 2009; 2(1): 63 - 71. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Dennert, H. J. Crijns, and S. Heymans Acute viral myocarditis Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2008; 29(17): 2073 - 2082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Magnani and G. W. Dec Myocarditis: Current Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment Circulation, February 14, 2006; 113(6): 876 - 890. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Baughman Diagnosis of Myocarditis: Death of Dallas Criteria Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 593 - 595. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Noutsias, M. Pauschinger, H.-P. Schultheiss, and U. Kuhl Advances in the immunohistological diagnosis of inflammatory cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2002; 4(suppl_I): I54 - I62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A D'Ambrosio, G Patti, A Manzoli, G Sinagra, A Di Lenarda, F Silvestri, and G Di Sciascio The fate of acute myocarditis between spontaneous improvement and evolution to dilated cardiomyopathy: a review Heart, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 499 - 504. [Full Text]

				A. M. Feldman and D. McNamara Myocarditis N. Engl. J. Med., November 9, 2000; 343(19): 1388 - 1398. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Angelini, V Calzolari, F Calabrese, G M Boffa, F Maddalena, R Chioin, and G Thiene Myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction: role of endomyocardial biopsy in the differential diagnosis Heart, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 245 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Lauer, M. Schannwell, U. Kuhl, B.-E. Strauer, and H.-P. Schultheiss Antimyosin autoantibodies are associated with deterioration of systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in patients with chronic myocarditis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 11 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Kuhl, B. Lauer, M. Souvatzoglu, H. Vosberg, and H.-P. Schultheiss Antimyosin scintigraphy and immunohistologic analysis of endomyocardial biopsy in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis--evidence of myocardial cell damage and inflammation in the absence of histologic signs of myocarditis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1371 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Angermann, K. Nassau, H.-U. Stempfle, T. M. Kruger, R. Drewello, R. Junge, P. Uberfuhr, M. Weiß, and K. Theisen Recognition of Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection From Serial Integrated Backscatter Analyses in Human Orthotopic Heart Transplant Recipients: Comparison With Conventional Echocardiography Circulation, January 7, 1997; 95(1): 140 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. E. Cunnion, J. E. Parrillo, B. Maisch, F. Camerini, H.-P. Schultheiss, L. T. Cooper, R. Shabetai, J. W. Mason, J. B. O'Connell, and B. M. McManus Immunosuppressive Therapy for Myocarditis N. Engl. J. Med., December 21, 1995; 333(25): 1713 - 1714. [Full Text]

				M. E. Billingham Myocarditis and Endomyocardial Biopsy Ann Intern Med, January 15, 1989; 110(2): 165 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.T. Lie Myocarditis and Endomyocardial Biopsy in Unexplained Heart Failure: A Diagnosis in Search of a Disease Ann Intern Med, October 1, 1988; 109(7): 525 - 528. [Abstract] [PDF]