Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1987;75:265-271

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Talajic, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nattel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Talajic, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nattel, S.

Circulation, Vol 75, 265-271, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Comparative electrophysiologic effects of intravenous amiodarone and desethylamiodarone in dogs: evidence for clinically relevant activity of the metabolite

M Talajic, MR DeRoode and S Nattel

It has been suggested that some of the effects of long-term amiodarone therapy may be due to accumulation of a metabolite, desethylamiodarone. To evaluate the pharmacologic actions of the metabolite, we gave single intravenous doses (10 or 25 mg/kg) of amiodarone or desethylamiodarone to anesthetized dogs. The resulting plasma and myocardial concentrations of both agents were similar to levels achieved with long- term oral amiodarone therapy in man. Amiodarone and desethylamiodarone produced frequency-dependent slowing in ventricular and atrioventricular nodal conduction and increased atrial and ventricular refractory periods. The relative effects of these agents on fast- and slow-channel tissues differed, with amiodarone producing significantly greater prolongation of Wenckebach cycle length and desethylamiodarone producing larger increases in QRS duration, atrial refractory period, and ventricular refractory period. We conclude that desethylamiodarone has substantial electrophysiologic effects at clinically relevant concentrations and has relatively greater effect on fast-channel tissue in vivo than does amiodarone. The accumulation of desethylamiodarone probably accounts for some of the delayed electrophysiologic effects in patients receiving long-term treatment with amiodarone.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
I. Kodama, K. Kamiya, and J. Toyama
Cellular electropharmacology of amiodarone
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 1997; 35(1): 13 - 29.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
X.-J. Du, M. D. Esler, and A. M. Dart
Sympatholytic Action of Intravenous Amiodarone in the Rat Heart
Circulation, January 15, 1995; 91(2): 462 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text]