Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1986;73:1281-1290

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Croft, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Croft, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, A. S.

Circulation, Vol 73, 1281-1290, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Abrupt withdrawal of beta-blockade therapy in patients with myocardial infarction: effects on infarct size, left ventricular function, and hospital course

CH Croft, RE Rude, N Gustafson, PH Stone, WK Poole, R Roberts, HW Strauss, DS Raabe Jr, LJ Thomas and AS Jaffe

The effects of abrupt withdrawal or continuation of beta-blockade therapy during acute myocardial infarction were evaluated in 326 patients participating in the Multicenter Investigation of the Limitation of Infarct Size (MILIS). Thirty-nine patients previously receiving a beta-blocker and randomly selected for withdrawal of beta- blockers and placebo treatment during infarction (group 1) were compared with 272 patients previously untreated with beta-blockers who were also randomly assigned to placebo therapy (group 2). There were no significant differences between the two groups in MB creatine kinase isoenzyme (15.8 +/- 10.9 vs 18.2 +/- 14.4 g-eq/m2, respectively) estimates of infarct size, radionuclide-determined left ventricular ejection fractions within 18 hr of infarction (0.44 +/- 0.15 vs 0.47 +/- 0.16) or 10 days later (0.42 +/- 0.14 vs 0.47 +/- 0.16), creatine kinase-determined incidence of infarct extension (13% vs 6%), congestive heart failure (43% vs 37%), nonfatal ventricular fibrillation (5% vs 7%), or in-hospital mortality (13% vs 9%). Patients in group 1 had more recurrent ischemic chest pain (p = .002) within the first 24 hr after infarction, but not thereafter. However, this did not appear to be related to a rebound increase in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, or double product. In a separate analysis, 20 propranolol- eligible group 1 patients randomly selected for withdrawal of beta- blockade (group 3) were compared with 15 patients randomly selected for continuation of prior beta-blockade therapy (group 4). This comparison yielded similar results. These data indicate that the beta-blockade withdrawal phenomenon is not a major clinical problem in patients with acute myocardial infarction. beta-Blockade therapy can be discontinued abruptly during acute myocardial infarction if clinically indicated.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, L. A. Fleisher, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 24, 2009; 54(22): e13 - e118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, K. E. Fleischmann, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 24, 2009; 54(22): 2102 - 2128.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
2009 WRITING GROUP TO REVIEW NEW EVIDENCE AND UPDA, K. E. Fleischmann, J. A. Beckman, C. E. Buller, H. Calkins, L. A. Fleisher, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Circulation, November 24, 2009; 120(21): 2123 - 2151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
2007 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Circulation, November 24, 2009; 120(21): e169 - e276.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. J. London
Quo Vadis, Perioperative Beta Blockade? Are You "POISE'd" on the Brink?
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1025 - 1030.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
X. Yu, S. Huang, E. Patterson, M. W. Garrett, K. M. Kaufman, J. P. Metcalf, M. Zhu, S. T. Dunn, and D. C. Kem
Proteasome degradation of GRK2 during ischemia and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in a canine model of myocardial infarction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): H1960 - H1967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. FERLINZ
Recognition and Management of Expanding Myocardial Infarction
Ann Intern Med, January 1, 1988; 108(1): 131 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]