Circulation, Vol 73, 885-891, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association
ME Hands, BL Lloyd, JS Robinson, N de Klerk and PL Thompson
To assess whether the site of myocardial infarction is an independent
prognostic indicator, the outcome of patients with anterior myocardial
infarction was compared with that of patients with inferior infarction. A
consecutive series of patients who had suffered their first myocardial
infarction was analyzed (398 with anterior and 391 with inferior
infarction). Patients with anterior myocardial infarction had a higher 1
year mortality than those with inferior infarction (18.3% vs 10.5%, p =
.002). When patients were matched for infarct size determined by peak
creatine kinase (CK) level expressed as a multiple of the upper limit of
normal, those with anterior myocardial infarction tended to have a higher 1
year mortality than those with inferior infarction for all subgroups of
peak CK. Early mortality (day 1 to 28 after myocardial infarction) was
greater in the anterior than in the inferior myocardial infarction group
(10% vs 6.4%, p = .03); this was most significant when peak CK was greater
than four times normal (12.4% vs 7.0%, p = .04). Late mortality was also
higher in the anterior (8.4% vs 4.1%, p = .04) than the inferior infarction
group and this was most significant when peak CK was less than two times
normal (15.2% vs 0%, p = .02) or greater than eight times normal (10.6% vs
4.1%, p = .04). Multivariate analysis with proportional-hazards regression
confirmed the prognostic significance of location of infarction independent
of peak CK level. Thus, infarct location was found to be a predictor of
prognosis that is independent of infarct size based on peak CK levels.
ARTICLES
Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic site of infarction after correction for enzymatic size of infarction
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. N. Graham, P. A. Smith, R. J. Huggett, J. B. Stoker, A. F. Mackintosh, and D. A.S.G. Mary Sympathetic Drive in Anterior and Inferior Uncomplicated Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, May 18, 2004; 109(19): 2285 - 2289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K KHAN Is BNP ready for use in clinical practice? Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 254 - 255. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Garcia, J. Elizaga, N. Perez-Castellano, J. A. Serrano, J. Soriano, M. Abeytua, J. Botas, R. Rubio, E. Lopez de Sa, J. L. Lopez-Sendon, et al. Primary angioplasty versus systemic thrombolysis in anterior myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 1999; 33(3): 605 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R W Parson, K D Jamrozik, M S T Hobbs, and D L Thompson Early identification of patients at low risk of death after myocardial infarction and potentially suitable for early hospital discharge BMJ, April 16, 1994; 308(6935): 1006 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Berger, J. M. Murabito, J. C. Evans, K. M. Anderson, and D. Levy Prognosis After First Myocardial Infarction: Comparison of Q-Wave and Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction in the Framingham Heart Study JAMA, September 23, 1992; 268(12): 1545 - 1551. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1986 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |