This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ciccone, J. M. Articles by Pantopoulos, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ciccone, J. M. Articles by Pantopoulos, D.

Circulation, Vol 71, 571-578, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

A prospective randomized study of the clinical efficacy and safety of transvenous cardioversion for termination of ventricular tachycardia

JM Ciccone, S Saksena, Y Shah and D Pantopoulos

The clinical efficacy and safety of transvenous cardioversion for termination of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) were examined by a prospective randomized study design in 22 patients (19 men, three women; mean age 64 +/- 9 years) with organic heart disease and sustained VT. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo an incremental low-energy protocol from 0.03 to 2.2 J (group A, 11 patients) or an incremental high-energy protocol from 0.5 to 10.0 J (group B, 11 patients). Transvenous cardioversion was performed during electrophysiologic studies in the control (drug-free) state and during serial antiarrhythmic drug testing in all patients. Both groups were comparable for demographic, disease and functional status, and electrophysiologic parameters. A total of 77 episodes of VT (group A, 45; group B, 32) were analyzed. The overall efficacy of transvenous cardioversion for termination of VT was 62% (group A 56% vs group B 72%; p less than .01). Antiarrhythmic drug therapy did not significantly enhance efficacy of transvenous cardioversion (control 59% vs drug 65%; p greater than .2). Stepwise discriminant analysis correlated successful transvenous cardioversion with longer VT cycle length (p less than .0005), higher energy (p less than .025), lower energy waveform tilt (p less than .025), shorter time to initial cardioversion attempt (p less than .025), and shorter QRS duration in sinus rhythm (p less than .05). Acceleration of VT was frequent (8% incidence per delivered shock). Thirty-one percent of all incremental shock protocols were terminated because of this complication. After cardioversion, transient arrhythmias were common (bradyarrhythmias 23%, supraventricular tachyarrhythmias 12%). Displacement of electrode catheters after transvenous cardioversion was uncommon (3%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Katz, R. J. Sweeney, R. M. Gill, P. R. Reid, and E. N. Prystowsky Relation of Atrial Refractoriness to Upper and Lower Limits of Vulnerability for Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Following Implantable Ventricular Defibrillator Shocks Circulation, September 7, 1999; 100(10): 1125 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Pinski and G. J. Fahy The Proarrhythmic Potential of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1651 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text]