Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1984;70:279-284

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guazzi, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bartorelli, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guazzi, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bartorelli, A.

Circulation, Vol 70, 279-284, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Calcium-channel blockade with nifedipine and angiotensin converting- enzyme inhibition with captopril in the therapy of patients with severe primary hypertension

MD Guazzi, N De Cesare, C Galli, A Salvioni, C Tramontana, G Tamborini and A Bartorelli

Nifedipine (10 mg qid) and captopril (25 mg qid) were tested alone and in combination in 14 patients suffering from severe primary hypertension. Each study period was of 1 week's duration. Circulatory response was evaluated through hourly pressure and pulse rate readings. The fall in pressure after oral nifedipine was maximal within 1 hr or less and was generally accompanied by palpitation and increase in pulse rate; with a six hourly dosing regimen the tendency of blood pressure to recover after each dose was interrupted by the next dose, so that values remained significantly reduced throughout the 24 hr, although pressure fluctuations were evident. Promptness of the antihypertensive action of captopril was similar, but the magnitude and the duration of the fall in pressure were less pronounced. When the converting-enzyme inhibitor was combined with the calcium-channel blocker, pressure fluctuations were not abolished, but the antihypertensive response was definitely enhanced, so that normal blood pressure was maintained for several hours during the day. Additional positive effects of captopril were mitigation of the heart rate reaction and prevention of the ankle pitting or edema elicited by nifedipine. A balance in arteriolar and venular dilatation promoted by captopril is the suggested mechanism for these effects. With the two-drug combination the function of the left ventricle was not reduced and possibly improved; blood urea nitrogen and serum electrolyte and creatinine concentration were not affected. Plasma renin activity increased with captopril and reverted toward baseline with the addition of nifedipine, suggesting an interference of the calcium-channel blocker with the release of renin.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
R. P. Blankfield
Fluid Matters in Choosing Antihypertensive Therapy: A Hypothesis That the Data Speak Volumes
J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2005; 18(2): 113 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
M U R Naidu, P R Usha, T R. K. Rao, and J C Shobha
Evaluation of amlodipine, lisinopril, and a combination in the treatment of essential hypertension
Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2000; 76(896): 350 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. Pedrinelli, G. Dell’Omo, E. Melillo, and M. Mariani
Amlodipine, Enalapril, and Dependent Leg Edema in Essential Hypertension
Hypertension, February 1, 2000; 35(2): 621 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Taherzadeh, A. K. Das, and J. B. Warren
Nifedipine increases microvascular permeability via a direct local effect on postcapillary venules
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 1998; 275(4): H1388 - H1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. M. ter Wee, A. G. De Micheli, and M. Epstein
Effects of Calcium Antagonists on Renal Hemodynamics and Progression of Nondiabetic Chronic Renal Disease
Arch Intern Med, June 13, 1994; 154(11): 1185 - 1202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. M. ter Wee and M. Epstein
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Progression of Nondiabetic Chronic Renal Disease
Arch Intern Med, August 9, 1993; 153(15): 1749 - 1759.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. M. Cummings, P. Amadio Jr, L. Nelson, and J. M. Fitzgerald
The Role of Calcium Channel Blockers in the Treatment of Essential Hypertension
Arch Intern Med, February 1, 1991; 151(2): 250 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
T. M. Hassell and A. F. Hefti
Drug-Induced Gingival Overgrowth: Old Problem, New Problem
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1991; 2(1): 103 - 137.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
Drugs Five Years Later: Nifedipine in Myocardial Ischemia, Systemic Hypertension, and Other Cardiovascular Disorders
Ann Intern Med, November 1, 1986; 105(5): 714 - 729.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. D. Guazzi, N. De Cesare, C. Galli, G. Tamborini, and A. Salvioni
Nitrendipine vs. Long-Acting Nifedipine in Mild, Moderate and Severe Hypertension
Angiology, July 1, 1986; 37(7): 508 - 518.
[Abstract] [PDF]