Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1983;67:743-749

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roubin, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roubin, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, D. T.

Circulation, Vol 67, 743-749, Copyright © 1983 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Coronary anatomy and prognosis after myocardial infarction in patients 60 years of age and younger

GS Roubin, PJ Harris, L Bernstein and DT Kelly

Two hundred twenty-nine hospital survivors of acute myocardial infarction (MI) age 60 years or younger underwent coronary arteriography a median of 2 weeks after infarction and were followed a median of 24 months (range 6-62 months). For 62%, MI was the first presentation of coronary disease and 75% were in clinical Killip class I. Overall outcome was good: 96% survival at 1 year and 95% survival at 2 years. This was due to the high prevalence of patients with one- vessel disease (58%), with a survival of 99% at 1 year and 96% at 2 years. Only 9% of patients had three-vessel disease and they had an 85% survival at 1 year. Eleven patients died and 23 had coronary bypass surgery. In this cohort of younger patients (mean age 51 years), prophylactic therapy may not be justified because of the low mortality and should be reserved for identifiable high-risk groups.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. J. Scanlon, D. P. Faxon, A.-M. Audet, B. Carabello, G. J. Dehmer, K. A. Eagle, R. D. Legako, D. F. Leon, J. A. Murray, S. E. Nissen, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1756 - 1824.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. G. Favaloro
Landmarks in the Development of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Circulation, August 4, 1998; 98(5): 466 - 478.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. M. Kuntz, J. Tsevat, L. Goldman, and M. C. Weinstein
Cost-effectiveness of Routine Coronary Angiography After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, September 1, 1996; 94(5): 957 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
A D Flapan
Fortnightly Review: Management of patients after their first myocardial infarction
BMJ, October 29, 1994; 309(6962): 1129 - 1134.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. M. Bodenheimer
Risk Stratification in Coronary Disease: A Contrary Viewpoint
Ann Intern Med, June 1, 1992; 116(11): 927 - 936.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. B. Wong, F. A. Sonnenberg, D. N. Salem, and S. G. Pauker
Myocardial Revascularization for Chronic Stable Angina: Analysis of the Role of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Based on Data Available in 1989
Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1990; 113(11): 852 - 871.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. F. DeBusk
Specialized Testing after Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction
Ann Intern Med, March 15, 1989; 110(6): 470 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]