This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Atwood, J. E. Articles by Ashburn, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Atwood, J. E. Articles by Ashburn, W.

Circulation, Vol 64, 601-609, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Agreement in human interpretation of analog thallium myocardial perfusion images

JE Atwood, D Jensen, V Froelicher, K Witztum, K Gerber, E Gilpin and W Ashburn

To assess the agreement of human interpretation of analog thallium myocardial perfusion images, four experienced interpreters evaluated 100 images on two occasions using a form designed to limit reader variability. A high intraobserver agreement (agreement by same observer at separate times) of 89--93% was found when films were interpreted as normal or abnormal (a dichotomous decision). Interobserver agreement for a majority grouping of observers (three or four) was 75% for an abnormal and 68% for a normal interpretation. However, agreement ranged from 11--79% when interpreters were asked to read the anatomic location of defects. Posterior and lateral wall defects were interpreted with the least amount of agreement. These results indicate that caution must be taken when interpreting defect location. Using a scale of 1--10 to grade the severity of a defect, correlations of 0.82--0.86 were found when reading defects in the lateral and anterior projections. Higher correlations, from 0.86--0.94, were found in left anterior oblique views. Use of reporting forms with specific criteria, multiple observers at one occasion, and/or computer processing may improve agreement. A brief review of the agreement of cardiology testing procedures is also presented.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Hemingway, R. Chen, C. Junghans, A. Timmis, S. Eldridge, N. Black, P. Shekelle, and G. Feder Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Angiography in Angina: Reliability and Validity Ann Intern Med, August 19, 2008; 149(4): 221 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sicari, P. Nihoyannopoulos, A. Evangelista, J. Kasprzak, P. Lancellotti, D. Poldermans, J.-U. Voigt, J. L. Zamorano, and on behalf of the European Association of Echocardi Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC) Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 415 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.V Anand, I.D Theodosiadis, and R Senior Improved interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiography following 4 months of systematic training in patients following acute myocardial infarction Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2004; 5(1): 12 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Pellerin and S.J.D. Brecker A step further in inter-institutional agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2002; 23(10): 768 - 771. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. G. Shekelle, J. P. Kahan, S. J. Bernstein, L. L. Leape, C. J. Kamberg, and R.E. Park The Reproducibility of a Method to Identify the Overuse and Underuse of Medical Procedures N. Engl. J. Med., June 25, 1998; 338(26): 1888 - 1895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]