This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Benjamin, I. J. Articles by Bulkley, B. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Benjamin, I. J. Articles by Bulkley, B. H. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Cardiomyopathy Heart Failure

Circulation, Vol 64, 442-447, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Cardiac hypertrophy in idiopathic dilated congestive cardiomyopathy: a clinicopathologic study

IJ Benjamin, EH Schuster and BH Bulkley

Although clinical studies indicate that patients with idiopathic dilated congestive cardiomyopathy who develop electrocardiographic or angiographic signs of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy may survive longer, there is little morphologic evidence for such anatomic favorable of unfavorable prognostic groups. We studied 30 autopsied patients who died of dilated cardiomyopathy; of these, 15 died within 1 year of the first symptom of their disease (short-term survivors) and 15 patients died 1-14 years after initial symptoms (long-term survivors). There were no significant differences in sex, race, clinical presentation or cause of death between the groups, but there were significant morphologic differences. In the short-term survivors, average heart weight was 540 g and LV wall thickness was 1.0 cm, whereas in the long-term survivors, the average heart weight was 759 g and LV wall thickness was 1.3 cm (p less than 0.001). LV cavity dilatation as measured by maximal transverse diameter from the postmortem angiograms did not differ between the two groups. These patients were compared with 10 autopsied patients with normal hearts and no clinical cardiac disease and 10 autopsied patients with volume overload secondary to valvular regurgitation. An LV hypertrophy/dilatation index (thickness/diameter) was 0.17 +/- 0.07 for the short-term survivors, 0.21 +/- 0.07 for the long-term survivors, 0.38 +/- 0.07 for volume overload patients, and 0.48 +/- 0.19 for normal subjects (F = 20.24, p less than 0.001). Thus, in patients with hypertrophy due to volume overload, wall thickening increased with dilatation, returning the ratio of wall thickness to cavity size toward normal. In contrast, among the idiopathic congestive cardiomyopathies, dilatation was disproportionate to hypertrophy and the difference was most marked for short-term survivors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Missri Non-Invasive Predictors of Short and Long-Term Survival in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Angiology, August 1, 1984; 35(8): 494 - 499. [Abstract] [PDF]