This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Norris, R. M. Articles by Barratt-Boyes, B. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Norris, R. M. Articles by Barratt-Boyes, B. G.

Circulation, Vol 63, 785-792, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Coronary surgery after recurrent myocardial infarction: progress of a trial comparing surgical with nonsurgical management for asymptomatic patients with advanced coronary disease

RM Norris, TM Agnew, PW Brandt, KJ Graham, DG Hill, AR Kerr, JB Lowe, AH Roche, RM Whitlock and BG Barratt-Boyes

A randomized trial of surgical vs nonsurgical management was carried out in men 60 years of age or younger who had recovered from a recurrent myocardial infarction. Of 205 patients considered, 100 had few or no symptoms and had coronary vessels favorable for bypass grafting; these patients fulfilled the trial conditions and were randomized (50 surgical and 50 nonsurgical). In 41 patients (elective nonsurgical group), randomization was not considered justifiable because of relatively unfavorable coronary anatomy or severe left ventricular dysfunction. Nineteen patients had elective surgery because of disabling angina despite full medical treatment or because of significant left main coronary stenosis. In 45 patients, coronary angiography was not undertaken because of medical contraindications or reluctance of the patient to enter the study. Actuarial survival curves (mean follow-up 4.5 years) show an annual mortality rate of 3-4% per year for all investigated patients, and no advantage for the randomized surgical over the randomized nonsurgical group. The results suggest that in the absence of disabling angina or left main coronary artery stenosis, coronary artery surgery need not be advised for survivors of recurrent infarctions who have severe coronary artery disease. Moreover, the prognosis for the group of patients not treated surgically appears to be better than has been previously described.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Gongora and T. M. Sundt III Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 599 - 632. [Full Text]

				N. S. Van de Water, J. K. French, M. Lund, T. A. Hyde, H. D. White, and P. J. Browett Prevalence of factor v leiden and prothrombin variant g20210a in patients age <50 years with no significant stenoses at angiography three to four weeks after myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 717 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Pepine and P. C. Deedwania How Do We Best Treat Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease? Circulation, November 10, 1998; 98(19): 1985 - 1986. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. PRYOR, M. C. HINDMAN, G. S. WAGNER, R. M. CALIFF, M. K. RHOADS, and R. A. ROSATI Early Discharge After Acute Myocardial Infarction Ann Intern Med, October 1, 1983; 99(4): 528 - 538. [Abstract] [PDF]