Circulation, Vol 61, 29-33, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association
S Thanavaro, RJ Krone, RE Kleiger, MA Province, JP Miller, VR deMello and GC Oliver
We studied the in-hospital mortality and morbidity of 745 patients who had
suffered a first myocardial infarction. One hundred twenty-four patients
(16.6%) had nontransmural infarction and 621 (83.4%) had transmural
infarction. Both groups of patients were similar in the distribution of
age, sex, and coronary risk factors. Patients with nontransmural infarction
had a significantly lower mortality (3% vs 11%, p less than 0.01) and a
lower prevalence of premature ventricular complexes (81% vs 88%, p less
than 0.05). The patients with transmural infarction were distributed evenly
among the three subgroups with peak SGOT levels less than 120 units,
120-240 units and more than 240 units (31%, 34% and 35%, respectively),
while most patients with nontransmural infarction (60%) had peak SGOT
levels less than 120 units (p less than 0.0001). When the in-hospital
mortality and morbidity were compared between the parallel subgroups, the
prognosis of patients with the two types of infarctions was similar. This
study shows that the peak SGOT level is more important than the type of
infarction in determining the acute mortality and morbidity of first
myocardial infarction.
ARTICLES
In-hospital prognosis of patients with first nontransmural and transmural infarctions
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Chan, L. Hanekom, C. Wong, R. Leano, G.-Y. Cho, and T. H. Marwick Differentiation of Subendocardial and Transmural Infarction Using Two-Dimensional Strain Rate Imaging to Assess Short-Axis and Long-Axis Myocardial Function J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2026 - 2033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, A. K.Y. Chan, C.-M. Yu, G. W.K. Yip, J. W.H. Fung, W. W.M. Lam, N. M.C. So, M. Wang, E. B. Wu, J. T. Wong, et al. Strain Rate Imaging Differentiates Transmural From Non-Transmural Myocardial Infarction: A Validation Study Using Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 6, 2005; 46(5): 864 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. C. Moon, D. Perez De Arenaza, A. G. Elkington, A. K. Taneja, A. S. John, D. Wang, R. Janardhanan, R. Senior, A. Lahiri, P. A. Poole-Wilson, et al. The pathologic basis of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 554 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Herlitz, B W Karlson, M Sjolin, and J Lindqvist Ten year mortality in subsets of patients with an acute coronary syndrome Heart, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 391 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Abdulla, B Brendorp, C Torp-Pedersen, L Kober, and on behalf of the TRACE study group Does the electrocardiographic presence of Q waves influence the survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction? Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2001; 22(12): 1008 - 1014. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Becker, M. Burns, N. Every, C. Maynard, P. Frederick, F. A. Spencer, J. M. Gore, C. Lambrew, and for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Early Clinical Outcomes and Routine Management of Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Perspective Arch Intern Med, February 26, 2001; 161(4): 601 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Berger, J. M. Murabito, J. C. Evans, K. M. Anderson, and D. Levy Prognosis After First Myocardial Infarction: Comparison of Q-Wave and Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction in the Framingham Heart Study JAMA, September 23, 1992; 268(12): 1545 - 1551. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Ridker, J. E. Manson, J. M. Gaziano, J. E. Buring, and C. H. Hennekens Low-Dose Aspirin Therapy for Chronic Stable Angina: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Ann Intern Med, May 15, 1991; 114(10): 835 - 839. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kouvaras, G. Chronopoulos, and D. V. Cokkinos Q and Non-Q Wave Myocardial Infarction: Current Views Angiology, April 1, 1988; 39(4): 333 - 340. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1980 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |