Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1979;59:313-319

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferlinz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Aronow, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferlinz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Aronow, W. S.

Circulation, Vol 59, 313-319, Copyright © 1979 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Effects of verapamil on myocardial performance in coronary disease

J Ferlinz, JL Easthope and WS Aronow

Verapamil, a calcium antagonist, has been used extensively for treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Concern persists, however, that it may seriously depress myocardial function in cardiac patients. To investigate this possibility, 20 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) but no heart failure were given intravenous verapamil (0.1 mg/kg bolus, followed by 0.005 mg/kg/min infusion), and studied hemodynamically and angiographically. Verapamil markedly lowered mean aortic pressure (94 +/- 17 to 82 +/- 13 mm Hg, p less than 0.0005) and systemic vascular resistance (1413 +/- 429 to 1069 +/- 235 dyn-sec-cm5, p less than 0.0005). Simultaneously, all indices of left ventricular (LV) performance greatly improved: cardiac index rose from 2.8 +/- 0.6 to 3.1 +/- 0.7 1/min/m2 (p less than 0.0005), mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening increased from 0.85 +/- 0.39 to 0.97 +/- 0.46 circ/sec (p less than 0.01), and ejection fraction improved from 55 +/- 16 to 61 +/- 18% (p less than 0.01). No significant changes were noted in the heart rate before and after verapamil administration, and verapamil did not worsen the extent of LV asynergy in the majority of patients. In patients with CAD, the intrinsic negative inotropic effect of verapamil is of negligible importance because its potent vasodilatory properties more than compensate for any intrinsic decrease in LV contractility, and thereby improve the overall cardiac function.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. L. Waldo, V. J. Plumb, J. G. Arciniegas, R. W. Henthorn, and S. H. Zimmern
Verapamil Therapy in the Treatment of Supraventricular Arrhythmias Following Open Heart Surgery
Angiology, December 1, 1983; 34(12): 755 - 763.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. N. Singh, K. Nademanee, and G. Feld
Antiarrhythmic Effects of Verapamil
Angiology, September 1, 1983; 34(9): 572 - 590.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. N. Singh
Pharmacological Basis for the Therapeutic Applications of Slow-Channel Blocking Drugs
Angiology, August 1, 1982; 33(8): 492 - 515.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. Kieval and R. J. Myerburg
The Hemodynamic Effects of Calcium Channel Blocking Agents: A Brief Review
Angiology, August 1, 1982; 33(8): 516 - 521.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. D. Winniford, J. T. Willerson, and L. D. Hillis
Calcium Antagonists in the Treatment of Individuals with Ischemic Heart Disease
Angiology, August 1, 1982; 33(8): 522 - 539.
[Abstract] [PDF]