Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1979;59:275-279

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pennock, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Waldhausen, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pennock, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Waldhausen, J. A.

Circulation, Vol 59, 275-279, Copyright © 1979 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Reduction of myocardial infarct size: comparison between left atrial and left ventricular bypass

JL Pennock, WE Pae Jr, WS Pierce and JA Waldhausen

A controlled study was undertaken to quantitate and compare the effect of left ventricular bypass (LVB) and left atrial bypass (LAB on left ventricular infarct volume (LVIV). After baseline studies, the left anterior descending coronary artery in each of 30 mongrel dogs was ligated 1-1.5 cm from its origin. After baseline ischemic studies, control dogs (group 1--10 dogs), LAB dogs (group 2--10 dogs), and LVB dogs (group 3--10 dogs) were monitored for four hours. Final infarct size was determined by the nitroblue tetrazolium staining technique. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and total systemic flow (TSF) showed no significant difference between control and left heart bypass groups. In group 1, the LVIV was 27.7 +/- 6.5 g/100 g left ventricle (LV). In group 2, left heart bypass (LHB) flow was 90 +/- 4% of TSF. The pressure time index (PTI) was 2845 +/- 52 mm Hg-sec/min. The PTI demonstrated no significant difference from cntrols. In group 2, LVIV was 22.5 +/- 6.0 g/100 g LV. LVIV was reduced 18.8% from controls (p less than 0.08). In group 2, LHB was complete. Left ventricular decompression (group 3) resulted in a PTI of 328 +/- 76 mm Hg-sec/min. The PTI was significantly different (p less than 0.001) from groups 1 and 2. The LVIV was 12.6 +/- 5.1 g/100 g LV. LVIV was reduced 54.5% from controls (p less than 0.001) and 44.0% from group 2 (p less than 0.001). These results suggest that LVB may be useful, not only in supporting the circulation in the patient with myocardial infarct and cardiogenic shock, but also in limiting infarct size.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Thiele, R. W. Smalling, and G. C. Schuler
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2007; 28(17): 2057 - 2063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Meyns, J. Stolinski, V. Leunens, E. Verbeken, and W. Flameng
Left ventricular support by Catheter-Mountedaxial flow pump reduces infarct size
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 2, 2003; 41(7): 1087 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Kono, K. Nishimura, T. Nishina, S. Yuasa, K. Ueyama, C. Hamada, T. Akamatsu, and M. Komeda
Autosynchronized systolic unloading during left ventricular assist with a centrifugal pump
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2003; 125(2): 353 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Kinoshita, H. Takano, S. Takaichi, Y. Taenaka, and T. Nakatani
Influence of Prolonged Ventricular Assistance on Myocardial Histopathology in Intact Heart
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1996; 61(2): 640 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. R. Ito
Gradual Onset of Myocardial Ischemia Results in Reduced Myocardial Infarction : Association With Reduced Contractile Function and Metabolic Downregulation
Circulation, April 1, 1995; 91(7): 2058 - 2070.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. Ide, A. Yamaguchi, T. Ino, H. Adachi, A. Mizuhara, K. Kawahito, H. Matsumoto, and I. Fujimasa
Evaluation of the pulsatility of a new pulsatile left ventricular assist device--the integrated cardioassist catheter--in dogs
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1994; 107(2): 569 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Biomater ApplHome page
S. J. Brister, R. D. Weisel, P. L. Birnbaum, and M. M. Madonik
Ventricular Assistance with a Centrifugal Pump
J Biomater Appl, April 1, 1990; 4(4): 391 - 404.



Home page
J Biomater ApplHome page
J. Hager, F. Brandstaetter, O. Dietze, I. Koller, and F. Unger
The Spindle Pump--A Nonpulsatile Blood Pump for Assisted Circulation
J Biomater Appl, January 1, 1990; 4(3): 225 - 330.



Home page
PerfusionHome page
J. Chalmers and T. Graham
Review article : Mechanical ventricular support in the management of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock
Perfusion, October 1, 1989; 4(4): 243 - 253.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomater ApplHome page
M. Szycher, W. Clay, D. Gernes, and C. Sherman
Thermedics' Approach to Ventricular Support Systems
J Biomater Appl, January 1, 1986; 1(1): 39 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]