Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1978;58:1190-1195

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipton, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hyndman, B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipton, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hyndman, B. H.

Circulation, Vol 58, 1190-1195, Copyright © 1978 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

A conductive catheter to improve patient safety during cardiac catheterization

MJ Lipton, AK Ream and BH Hyndman

A 60 Hz current, as small as 20 microamperemeter (rms) is capable of causing ventricular fibrillation when directly applied to the heart. Significant cost and engineering effort has been spent to construct monitoring equipment which satisfies the safety regulations requiring maximum leakage currents below this value. Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization are particularly at risk from electrical hazards, primarily because catheters are made from nonconductive materials. A conductive catheter should allow externally applied currents to leak through its walls before reaching the catheter tip. A new electrically conductive catheter was compared with a standard nonconductive catheter. Five dogs were studied, with 81 attempts to cause fibrillation. Sixty-hertz voltage between the catheter and an external electrode was increased until fibrillation occurred or 130 V was reached. Eight states were studied in randomized sequence: conductive or nonconductive catheter, guidewire or saline-filled and tip touching wall, or free in left ventricle (verified by fluoroscopy and cineangiography). The saline-filled and conductive catheter was safer in that fibrillation never occurred, while fibrillation nearly always occurred with the nonconductive catheter. A conductive guidewire negates the protection of the conductive catheter. The application of conductive catheters could reduce instrumentation costs in laboratories and intensive care units and improve patient safety.