Circulation, Vol 58, 1057-1064, Copyright © 1978 by American Heart Association
NE Kramer, KK Chawla, R Patel, M Khan, T Mayer and WD Towne
The differentiation of posterobasal myocardial infarction (PMI) from either
right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) or normal subjects displaying an
anterior loop (AL) by electrocardiography (ECG) or vectorcardiography (VCG)
is difficult. M-mode echocardiography (echo) via the anterior and
subxiphoid methods has been helpful in defining cardiac chamber size and
wall motion abnormalities. We tested whether this relatively more direct
method would better separate these entities compared with the other two
techniques. ECG and VCG using established criteria failed to distinguish
the three conditions effectively. By echo, distinguishing characteristics
were observed in each of the groups. Thus, right ventricular diastolic
dimension and wall thickness were significantly increased only in the RVH
group, echo dimensions and wall motion were normal in the AL group and the
posterior left ventricular systolic thickening response and ejection phase
indices were significantly reduced only by the subxiphoid method in the PMI
group. To test the specificity of the latter finding, posterior wall motion
in three infarction groups (posterior, combined posteroinferior and
inferior) were examined and suggested that the target of the subxiphoid
beam focuses on a more superior posterobasal left ventricular segment than
the anteriorly placed transducer. Echocardiography can differentiate PMI
from either RVH or AL more directly than ECG or VCG, and may be of
practical clinical importance.
ARTICLES
Differentiation of posterior myocardial infarction from right ventricular hypertrophy and normal anterior loop by echocardiography
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1978 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |