Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1977;56:240-244

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheinman, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by O'Young, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scheinman, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by O'Young, J.

Circulation, Vol 56, 240-244, Copyright © 1977 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Prognostic value of infranodal conduction time in patients with chronic bundle branch block

MM Scheinman, RW Peters, G Modin, M Brennan, C Mies and J O'Young

His bundle recordings were obtained in 121 patients with chronic bundle branch block and the patients were followed for a mean period of 18 months. Seventy-nine patients had an infranodal conduction time (H-Q) less than 70 msec while 42 had H-Q greater than or equal to 70 msec. There was no significant difference in mean age, smoking history, diabetes, syncope, dizziness, blood pressure, and serum cholesterol or triglyceride levels between the two groups. There was a significantly greater incidence of progresssion to second degree or third degree atrioventricular block (9/42, 21%), and of severe congestive heart failure (16/42, 38%) in patients with H-Q greater than or equal to 70 compared with those with H-Q less than 70 (1/79, 1.3%; and 13/79, 16%, respectively). The risk of sudden death was significantly greater only in the group with H-Q greater than or equal to 70 and severe congestive heart failure. There was no correlation between the presence of first degree atrioventricular block and/or any particular type of bundle branch block pattern with sudden death and/or progression to second degree or third degree atrioventricular block. Analysis of the surface electrocardiogram is only of limited value in predicting high risk patients with chronic bundle branch block. Electrophysiologic studies are of greatest value in patients with bundle branch block with transient neurologic symptoms in whom no cause for the symptoms is evident.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. E. Epstein, J. P. DiMarco, K. A. Ellenbogen, N.A. M. Estes III, R. A. Freedman, L. S. Gettes, A. M. Gillinov, G. Gregoratos, S. C. Hammill, D. L. Hayes, et al.
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): e1 - e62.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. E. Epstein, J. P. DiMarco, K. A. Ellenbogen, N.A. Mark Estes III, R. A. Freedman, L. S. Gettes, A. M. Gillinov, G. Gregoratos, S. C. Hammill, D. L. Hayes, et al.
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): 2085 - 2105.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Writing Committee Members, A. E. Epstein, J. P. DiMarco, K. A. Ellenbogen, N.A. M. Estes III, R. A. Freedman, L. S. Gettes, A. M. Gillinov, G. Gregoratos, S. C. Hammill, et al.
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): 2820 - 2840.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Writing Committee Members, A. E. Epstein, J. P. DiMarco, K. A. Ellenbogen, N.A. M. Estes III, R. A. Freedman, L. S. Gettes, A. M. Gillinov, G. Gregoratos, S. C. Hammill, et al.
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): e350 - e408.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Committee Members, G. Gregoratos, J. Abrams, A. E. Epstein, R. A. Freedman, D. L. Hayes, M. A. Hlatky, R. E. Kerber, G. V. Naccarelli, M. H. Schoenfeld, et al.
ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2002; 40(9): 1703 - 1719.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Gregoratos, J. Abrams, A. E. Epstein, R. A. Freedman, D. L. Hayes, M. A. Hlatky, R. E. Kerber, G. V. Naccarelli, M. H. Schoenfeld, M. J. Silka, et al.
ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)
Circulation, October 15, 2002; 106(16): 2145 - 2161.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. J. Klein, B. J. Gersh, and R. Yee
Electrophysiological Testing : The Final Court of Appeal for Diagnosis of Syncope?
Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1332 - 1335.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. S. Manolis, M. Linzer, D. Salem, and N. A. M. Estes III
Syncope: Current Diagnostic Evaluation and Management
Ann Intern Med, June 1, 1990; 112(11): 850 - 863.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. H. McAnulty and S. H. Rahimtoola
Chronic Bundle-Branch Block: Clinical Significance and Management
JAMA, November 13, 1981; 246(19): 2202 - 2204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. P. DiMARCO, H. GARAN, J. W. HARTHORNE, and J. N. RUSKIN
Intracardiac Electrophysiologic Techniques in Recurrent Syncope of Unknown Cause
Ann Intern Med, November 1, 1981; 95(5): 542 - 548.
[Abstract] [PDF]