Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1976;54:756-761

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kronenberg, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kronenberg, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, P. N.

Circulation, Vol 54, 756-761, Copyright © 1976 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

ST-segment variations after acute myocardial infarction. Relationship to clinical status

MW Kronenberg, M Hodges, T Akiyama, DL Roberts, DA Ehrich, TL Biddle and PN Yu

The degree of vectorcardiographic ST-segment elevation was employed as an index of myocardial ischemic injury in a study of 27 patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The ST-segment vector magnitude (STVM) was derived from the continuously recorded modified Frank vectorcardiogram and was plotted serially by hours after onset of AMI. The STVM in normal subjects was 51.1 +/- 7.1 muV (mean +/- SE). A standard deviation of the pooled variance of 15.2 muV was obtained in a group of control patients and a change of more than 2 SD (greater than 30 muV) in an individual STVM was considered to be significant. The STVM progressively decreased in patients who survived without clinical complications while it remained elevated in those with congestive heart failure. A modest, sustained re-elevation of STVM was observed in patients who developed pericarditis, and a significant late average increase of 64 muV occurred in survivors with infarct extension. In contrast, STVM underwent a major increase in patients who died. In five of these six patients without associated pericarditis a mean increase of 164 muV was recorded in the last 5-12 hours of life. While death was clinically predictable in two patients with cardiogenic shock, it was not so for the four other patients who died. Thus, major increases in STVM frequently suggested significant new ischemic injury and were often premonitory to sudden death after AMI. The increases preceding death implied that not only ventricular extopy but also lethal conduction abnormalities after AMI might be ischemia-related.