Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1976;54:738-743

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lalani, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lalani, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. J.

Circulation, Vol 54, 738-743, Copyright © 1976 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output using the mitral valve and aortic root echo

AV Lalani and SJ Lee

The current echo method for measuring cardiac output (CO) has various technical limitations and is based on the assumptions that the left ventricle is not dilated and that it contracts uniformly. We have taken a different approach to measuring CO by echo: CO = cross-sectional area of aortic root X left ventricular ejection time X mean aortic flow velocity X heart rate. Using the Fick method, 34 measurements of CO were made in patients with normal aortic and mitral valves, with simultaneous echo recordings from the aortic and mitral valves. The systolic closure slope of the anterior mitral valve leaflet was assumed to represent the mean aortic flow velocity. CO by Fick and the proposed echo method correlated well, both in patients with (r = 0.94) and those without (r = 0.87) asynergy and the overall correlation was strong (r = 0.90). Using the conventional echo and Fick methods, a much weaker association was found between the two measurements in those patients with asynergy (r = 0.44) as opposed to those without asynergy (r = 0.77).