Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1975;51:244-250

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Denes, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Denes, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, K. M.

Circulation, Vol 51, 244-250, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Eectrophysiological observations in pateints with rate dependent bundle branch block

P Denes, D Wu, RC Dhingra, F Amat-y-leon, C Wyndham and KM Rosen

Electrophysiological studies were conducted in 15 patients with tachycardic rate dependent bundle branch block (RDBBB): ten with left, and five with right. No bradycardic RDBBB was observed, despite occurrence of cycle lengths (CL) longer than 1200 msec in over half the patients studied. Onset of RDBBB was abrupt in 13 patients, and gradual in two. In three patients, the CL allowing reversion to normal conduction (once RDBBB was initiated) was 50, 55, and 190 msec longer, respectively, than the CL inducing RDBBB. Bundle brance refractory periods (RP) were measured with atrial extrastimulus technique in five patients. All RP (except one) were prolonged at all tested CL when compared to patients without conduction disease. The expected decrease in RP with shortening of CL did not occur in four of the five patients. The electrophysiological abnormality in patients with DBBB thus appeared to be an increase in refractoriness in the affected bundle branch, along with a loss of the normal decrease in refractoriness with decrease in CL. Similar findings might be demonstrable in patients with early bundle branch disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
G Breithardt, H Kuhn, D Hammel, H.-H Scheld, L Seipel, and D. Bocker
Cardiac resynchronization therapy into the next decade: from the past to morbidity/mortality trials
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., April 1, 2002; 4(suppl_D): D102 - D110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. M. Michelotti and S. Swiryn
Intermittent Left Bundle Branch Block and Associated T-Wave Abnormalities
Arch Intern Med, September 1, 1985; 145(9): 1667 - 1670.
[Abstract] [PDF]