Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1971;44:982-993

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HELFANT, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by MEISTER, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HELFANT, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by MEISTER, S. G.

(Circulation. 1971;44:982.)
© 1971 American Heart Association, Inc.


Effect of Sustained Isometric Handgrip Exercise on Left Ventricular Performance

RICHARD H. HELFANT M.D.1; MARIA A. DEVILLA M.D.1; STEVEN G. MEISTER M.D.1

1 From the Division of Cardiology, Presbyterian-University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Sustained isometric handgrip exercise was studied in 28 patients, 19 with and nine without catheterization evidence of heart disease. Significant increases occurred in left ventricular systolic and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures (LVEDP), heart rate, cardiac output, and cardiac index, with decreases in stroke volume and stroke index. When control and abnormal groups were compared, no differences could be demonstrated in systolic pressure or heart rate increases. However, the LVEDP increase in the abnormal subjects (9.7 ± 1.7) was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than in the controls (2.1 ± 0.7). In addition, cardiac index rose significantly (P < 0.025) in the controls (0.8 ± 0.2), but not (P < 0.1) in the abnormal subjects (0.2 ± 0.1). Conversely, there was a significant fall in stroke index in the abnormal (P < 0.005) but not in the control (P < 0.4) group.

When work or stroke-work index-LVEDP relations were compared, the controls uniformly exhibited steep curves, whereas abnormal patients demonstrated curves that were either less steep or flat. DgrWork/DgrLVEDP ratio was [See Equation in PDF File]1.0 in the controls, with one exception, and [See Equation in PDF File]0.77 in the abnormal subjects, with one exception.

The test was performed in less than 4 min and no adverse effects were observed. By virtue of its ease, simplicity, safety, and ability to distinguish normal and abnormal ventricular performance, sustained handgrip is a valuable new stress test.


Key Words: Systolic pressure • Cardiac index • Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure • Heart rate • Stroke-work index • Cardiac output • Left ventricular work

Submitted on May 27, 1971
Accepted on July 20, 1971




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. Mizushige, H. Masugata, H. Morita, S. Senda, H. Matsuo, and K. Mizushige
Left Ventricular Diastolic Filling Dynamics During Isometric Exertion in Syndrome X Assessed with Doppler Flowmetry
Angiology, October 1, 1997; 48(10): 871 - 881.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
G.J. Barendsen and Jw. van den Berg
Arterial Blood Pressure and the Flow in the Calf at Rest and During Reactive Hyperemia
Angiology, September 1, 1981; 32(9): 615 - 623.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
S. G. Chrysant
Hemodynamic Effects of Isometric Exercise in Normotensive Hypertensive Subjects Hypertension
Angiology, May 1, 1978; 29(5): 379 - 385.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. A. Franciosa
Outflow Resistance as a Regulator of Left Ventricular Performance
Angiology, May 1, 1978; 29(5): 393 - 401.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. Motomiya, T. Sano, and T. Shimamoto
Effect of Isometric Handgrip On Systolic Time Intervals in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease and Cyclic Amp Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor Pretreatment
Angiology, May 1, 1977; 28(5): 346 - 350.
[PDF]