Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1971;43:279-287

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAFT, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by GORLIN, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HAFT, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by GORLIN, R.

(Circulation. 1971;43:279.)
© 1971 American Heart Association, Inc.


Left Bundle Branch Block

Etiologic, Hemodynamic, and Ventriculographic Considerations

JACOB I. HAFT M.D.1; MICHAEL V. HERMAN M.D.1; RICHARD GORLIN M.D.1

1 From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Coronary angiography, cine left ventriculography, and the cardiovascular hemodynamics of 24 patients with left bundle branch block were studied. Seven patients were found to have significant coronary artery disease, always severe. Five had cardiomyopathy and seven had valvular disease. Only those with coronary artery disease or cardiomyopathy had abnormal left ventricular contraction patterns. The onset of left ventricular contraction was delayed in the patients with left bundle branch block, but the period of isovolumic contraction was normal in those without severe underlying disease. Left axis deviation in addition to left bundle branch block did not imply more frequent coronary atherosclerosis.


Key Words: Coronary angiography • Left ventriculography • Electromechanical delay

Submitted on March 30, 1970
Accepted on October 26, 1970




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
R. Sicari
Risk stratification by stress echocardiography beyond wall motion analysis.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2009; 2(3): 260 - 262.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. M. Wagdy, D. Hodge, T. F. Christian, T. D. Miller, and R. J. Gibbons
Prognostic Value of Vasodilator Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Left Bundle-Branch Block
Circulation, April 28, 1998; 97(16): 1563 - 1570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. M. Michelotti and S. Swiryn
Intermittent Left Bundle Branch Block and Associated T-Wave Abnormalities
Arch Intern Med, September 1, 1985; 145(9): 1667 - 1670.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. F. SCHNEIDER, H. E. THOMAS Jr., B. E. KREGER, P. M. McNAMARA, and W. B. KANNEL
Newly Acquired Left Bundle-Branch Block: The Framingham Study
Ann Intern Med, March 1, 1979; 90(3): 303 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
E. Macieira-Coelho, A. Lema-Santos, H.B. Machado, and L.L. Faleiro
Systolic Time Intervals and Heart Sounds in Left Bundle Branch Block
Angiology, July 1, 1976; 27(7): 447 - 454.
[PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. Scheidt and T. Killip
Bundle-Branch Block Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
JAMA, November 20, 1972; 222(8): 919 - 924.
[Abstract] [PDF]