Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1969;39:663-674

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MOSER, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by MIALE, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MOSER, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by MIALE, A., JR.

(Circulation. 1969;39:663.)
© 1969 American Heart Association, Inc.


Assessment of Pulmonary Photoscanning and Angiography in Experimental Pulmonary Embolism

KENNETH M. MOSER M.D.1; PAUL HARSANYI M.D.1; GEORGE RIUS-GARRIGA M.D.1; MICHEL GUISAN M.D.1; GLEN A. LANDIS M.D.1; AUGUST MIALE JR. M.D.1

1 From the Pulmonary Division and Radioisotope Unit, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.

The diagnostic reliability and specificity of pulmonary angiography and perfusion photoscanning were examined by applying both technics in two series of dogs: one subjected to multiple small pulmonary emboli; the other, to massive embolization. Interpretations of the angiograms and photoscans by two observers were correlated with each other and autopsy data. Analysis disclosed a high degree of agreement between the two technics. Application of both technics, however, led to a greater incidence and accuracy of embolic detection than either method provided alone. Both technics were subject to interpretive errors leading to false positive and false negative diagnoses. The factors promoting such errors are discussed. It is concluded that the two technics are complementary, not competitive, and that each is least reliable in detecting emboli at the extremes of size.


Key Words: Filling defects • Necropsy findings • Cutoffs • Decreased flow




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Patel and E. A. Kazerooni
Helical CT for the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 135 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
W. Seed
Pulmonary embolism: Part 2 Diagnostic methods and management
Vascular Medicine, September 1, 1991; 2(2): 121 - 136.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. J. Bynum, R. W. Parkey, and J. E. Wilson III
Tests of Fibrin Metabolism in Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism
Arch Intern Med, October 1, 1977; 137(10): 1385 - 1389.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. J. Bynum and J. E. Wilson III
Characteristics of Pleural Effusions Associated With Pulmonary Embolism
Arch Intern Med, February 1, 1976; 136(2): 159 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. J. McNeil, B. L. Holman, and S. J. Adelstein
The Scintigraphic Definition of Pulmonary Embolism
JAMA, February 18, 1974; 227(7): 753 - 756.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
W. M. Hamilton and P. Nemir Jr.
The Humoral Factor in Pulmonary Embolism
Arch Surg, October 1, 1972; 105(4): 593 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. M. MOSER, M. GUISAN, A. CUOMO, and W. L. ASHBURN
Differentiation of Pulmonary Vascular from Parenchymal Diseases by Ventilation/Perfusion Scintiphotography
Ann Intern Med, October 1, 1971; 75(4): 597 - 605.
[Abstract] [PDF]