Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;120:384-390
Published online before print July 20, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.835470
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Circulation: August 4, 2009, Volume 120, Number 5
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
120/5/384    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.835470v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marma, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd-Jones, D. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marma, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd-Jones, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Epidemiology

(Circulation. 2009;120:384-390.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Epidemiology

Systematic Examination of the Updated Framingham Heart Study General Cardiovascular Risk Profile

Amanda K. Marma, MD; Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, MD, ScM

From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.

Correspondence to Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, MD, ScM, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N Lake Shore Dr, Suite 1102, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail dlj{at}northwestern.edu

Received November 13, 2008; accepted May 22, 2009.

Background— An updated Framingham risk prediction tool was recently published. It features an expanded end point of general cardiovascular disease and a "vascular age" risk communication analogy.

Methods and Results— We systematically examined the tool to determine which risk factor combinations allow risk thresholds to be reached and how different risk factor burdens translate into vascular age. We varied risk factor levels in isolation and combination and observed risk output patterns, with high risk defined as ≥20% 10-year predicted risk. As expected, we found that age is the major determinant of 10-year predicted risk for both men and women. Younger individuals tend not to exceed 20% 10-year risk even with multiple risk factors, although with marked risk factor burden, including both smoking and diabetes mellitus, men as young as 35 years of age and women as young as 40 years of age can be classified as high risk. For the risk factor levels we entered, predicted risk ranges from 3.1% to 46.8% for a 45-year-old man and 2.4% to 42.7% for a 55-year-old woman. Likewise, vascular age ranges from 37 to >80 years for a 45-year-old man and 39 to >80 years for a 55-year-old woman.

Conclusions— The inclusion of noncoronary end points in this tool expands the range of predicted risks for men and women at all ages studied. Nevertheless, many younger individuals with high risk factor burden have low 10-year predicted risk. Wide ranges of "vascular age" are available for most chronological ages to assist with risk communication.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. S. Vasan and W. B. Kannel
Strategies for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Prevention Over the Life Course: Progress Amid Imperfections
Circulation, August 4, 2009; 120(5): 360 - 363.
[Full Text] [PDF]