Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;120:1505-1512
Published online before print September 28, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.850073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
120/15/1505    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.109.850073v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilos, M.
Right arrow Articles by De Bruyne, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilos, M.
Right arrow Articles by De Bruyne, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease
Right arrow Coronary circulation
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2009;120:1505-1512.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Interventional Cardiology

Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Treatment in Patients With Angiographically Equivocal Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

Michalis Hamilos, MD, PhD*; Olivier Muller, MD, PhD*; Thomas Cuisset, MD; Argyrios Ntalianis, MD, PhD; Gregory Chlouverakis, PhD; Giovanna Sarno, MD; Olivier Nelis, RN; Jozef Bartunek, MD, PhD; Marc Vanderheyden, MD; Eric Wyffels, MD; Emanuele Barbato, MD, PhD; Guy R. Heyndrickx, MD, PhD; William Wijns, MD, PhD; Bernard De Bruyne, MD, PhD

From the Cardiovascular Centre Aalst, Aalst, Belgium (M.H., O.M., T.C., A.N., G.S., O.N., J.B., M.V., E.W., E.B., G.R.H., W.W., B.D.B.), and Laboratory of Biostatistics, Medical School, University of Crete, Crete, Greece (G.C.).

Correspondence to Bernard De Bruyne, MD, PhD, Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Hospital, Moorselbaan, 164, B-9300 Aalst, Belgium. E-mail bernard.de.bruyne{at}olvz-aalst.be

Received September 4, 2008; accepted July 31, 2009.

Background— Significant left main coronary artery stenosis is an accepted indication for surgical revascularization. The potential of angiography to evaluate the hemodynamic severity of a stenosis is limited. The aims of the present study were to assess the long-term clinical outcome of patients with an angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis in whom the revascularization strategy was based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) and to determine the relationship between quantitative coronary angiography and FFR.

Methods and Results— In 213 patients with an angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis, FFR measurements and quantitative coronary angiography were performed. When FFR was ≥0.80, patients were treated medically or another stenosis was treated by coronary angioplasty (nonsurgical group; n=138). When FFR was <0.80, coronary artery bypass grafting was performed (surgical group; n=75). The 5-year survival estimates were 89.8% in the nonsurgical group and 85.4% in the surgical group (P=0.48). The 5-year event-free survival estimates were 74.2% and 82.8% in the nonsurgical and surgical groups, respectively (P=0.50). Percent diameter stenosis at quantitative coronary angiography correlated significantly with FFR (r=–0.38, P<0.001), but a very large scatter was observed. In 23% of patients with a diameter stenosis <50%, the left main coronary artery stenosis was hemodynamically significant by FFR.

Conclusions— In patients with equivocal stenosis of the left main coronary artery, angiography alone does not allow appropriate individual decision making about the need for revascularization and often underestimates the functional significance of the stenosis. The favorable outcome of an FFR-guided strategy suggests that FFR should be assessed in such patients before a decision is made "blindly" about the need for revascularization.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 120: 1457-1458. [Extract] [Full Text]