This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 120/11/935    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.108.832444v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Tabata, M. Articles by Bolman, R. M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tabata, M. Articles by Bolman, R. M., III Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Coronary Artery Disease Related Collections Health policy and outcome research CV surgery: coronary artery disease Related Article

(Circulation. 2009;120:935-940.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cardiovascular Surgery

Prevalence and Variability of Internal Mammary Artery Graft Use in Contemporary Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database

Minoru Tabata, MD, MPH; Joshua D. Grab, MS; Zain Khalpey, MD, PhD; Fred H. Edwards, MD; Sean M. O'Brien, PhD; Lawrence H. Cohn, MD; R. Morton Bolman, III, MD

From the Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.T., Z.K., L.H.C., R.M.B.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (J.D.G., S.M.O.); and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Florida, Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Jacksonville (F.H.E.).

Correspondence to Minoru Tabata, MD, MPH, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sakakibara Heart Institute, 3–16–1 Asahi-Cho, Fuchu-Shi, Tokyo 183–0003, Japan. E-mail mtabata{at}post.harvard.edu

Received November 1, 2008; accepted July 14, 2009.

Background— Use of an internal mammary artery (IMA) is a well-recognized, nationally endorsed quality indicator for evaluating the process of operative care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. An objective assessment of the current status of IMA use has not been systematically performed.

Methods and Results— This cross-sectional observational study analyzed data on 541 368 coronary artery bypass graft surgery procedures reported by 745 hospitals in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database from 2002 through 2005. We assessed the current status of IMA use, the association of hospital volume and IMA use, and disparities in IMA use by patient gender and race and by region of hospital location. Rates of using at least 1 IMA and bilateral IMA were 92.4% and 4.0%, with increasing trends over the years. Hospital volume was not significantly associated with IMA use. IMAs were used less frequently in women than men (for at least 1 IMA: odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.63; for bilateral IMA: odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.68) and less frequently in nonwhite patients than white patients (for at least 1 IMA: odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 0.87; for bilateral IMA: odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 0.83). There were significant differences in frequency of IMA use by hospital region.

Conclusions— Frequency of IMA use in coronary artery bypass graft surgery is increasing; however, many patients still do not receive the benefits of IMA grafts, and some hospitals have a very low IMA use rate. Hospital volume is not associated with IMA use in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Analysis of this critical performance measure reveals significant gender and race disparities.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 120: 919-920. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Internal Mammary Artery Use in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Room for Improvement Journal Watch Cardiology, October 28, 2009; 2009(1028): 2 - 2. [Full Text]