Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;119:2735-2740
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.812693
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menasché, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menasché, P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Arrhythmia
*Heart Failure
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow CV surgery: transplantation, ventricular assistance, cardiomyopathy
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

(Circulation. 2009;119:2735-2740.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Special Report

Stem Cell Therapy for Heart Failure

Are Arrhythmias a Real Safety Concern?

Philippe Menasché, MD, PhD

From the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou; Faculté de Médecine, University Paris Descartes; and L'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 633, Paris, France.

Correspondence to Dr Philippe Menasché, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France. E-mail philippe.menasche{at}egp.aphp.fr

So far, the major safety issue raised by the use of stem cells for cardiac repair has been the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, particularly after skeletal myoblast transplantation. Although one cannot refute a potential intrinsic arrhythmogenicity of stem cells, primarily related to their common lack of electromechanical integration into the recipient myocardium, it is also important to recognize that patients eligible for cell replacement therapy are prone to develop arrhythmias because of their underlying ischemic heart disease. Another confounding factor is the method used for the intramyocardial delivery of the cells, which can cause enough inflammatory tissue damage to further increase ventricular irritability on top of an already high baseline level. Thus any strategy designed to minimize the risk of stem cell–associated ventricular arrhythmias should take into account, besides the cell-specific ability to appropriately couple with host cardiomyocytes, the method of cell transfer and the nature of the myocardial environment targeted for cell engraftment. A more accurate characterization of the baseline risk of arrhythmias in these patients would thus be helpful for better assessing the respective contribution of the donor cells and the host myocardium to these complications. The risk-to-benefit ratio of stem cell therapy will finally have to be revisited in light of the fact that because this baseline risk is usually high, most of these patients will in any way be fitted with an implantable defibrillator.


Key Words: arrhythmia • cells • heart failure • myocardial infarction • stem cells




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
B. J. Gersh, R. D. Simari, A. Behfar, C. M. Terzic, and A. Terzic
Cardiac Cell Repair Therapy: A Clinical Perspective
Mayo Clin. Proc., October 1, 2009; 84(10): 876 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]