This Article Free upon publication Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 119/15/2096    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.108.768325v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Berdowski, J. Articles by Koster, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berdowski, J. Articles by Koster, R. W. Related Collections CPR and emergency cardiac care Related Article

(Circulation. 2009;119:2096-2102.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Resuscitation Science

Importance of the First Link

Description and Recognition of an Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in an Emergency Call

Jocelyn Berdowski, MS, MSE; Freerk Beekhuis, RN; Aeilko H. Zwinderman, PhD; Jan G.P. Tijssen, PhD; Rudolph W. Koster, MD, PhD

From the Departments of Cardiology (J.B., F.B., J.G.P.T., R.W.K.) and Clinical Biostatistics (A.H.Z.), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Correspondence to Jocelyn Berdowski, MS, MSE, Department of Cardiology, F3–241, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail J.Berdowski{at}amc.nl

Received April 24, 2008; accepted January 30, 2009.

Background— The content of emergency calls for suspected cardiac arrest is rarely analyzed. This study investigated the recognition of a cardiac arrest by dispatchers and its influence on survival rates.

Methods and Results— During 8 months, voice recordings of 14 800 consecutive emergency calls were collected to audit content and cardiac arrest recognition. The presence of cardiac arrest during the call was assessed from the ambulance crew report. Included calls were placed by laypersons on site and did not involve trauma. Prevalence of cardiac arrest was 3.0%. Of the 285 cardiac arrests, 82 (29%) were not recognized during the call, and 64 of 267 suspected calls (24%) were not cardiac arrest. We analyzed a random sample (n=506) of 9230 control calls. Three-month survival was 5% when a cardiac arrest was not recognized versus 14% when it was recognized (P=0.04). If the dispatcher did not recognize the cardiac arrest, the ambulance was dispatched a mean of 0.94 minute later (P<0.001) and arrived 1.40 minutes later on scene (P=0.01) compared with recognized calls. The main reason for not recognizing the cardiac arrest was not asking if the patient was breathing (42 of 82) and not asking to describe the type of breathing (16 of 82). Normal breathing was never mentioned in true cardiac arrest calls. A logistic regression model identified spontaneous trigger words like facial color that could contribute to cardiac arrest recognition (odds ratio, 7.8 to 9.7).

Conclusions— Not recognizing a cardiac arrest during emergency calls decreases survival. Spontaneous words that the caller uses to describe the patient may aid in faster and better recognition of a cardiac arrest.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 2017-2019. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Ornato Science of Emergency Medical Dispatch Circulation, April 21, 2009; 119(15): 2023 - 2025. [Full Text] [PDF]