(Circulation. 2009;119:2069-2077.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Imaging |
From the Department of Radiology (R.W.v.d.M., H.J.L., A.d.R.), Department of Endocrinology (J.A.R., J.W.A.S.), Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (H.W.A.M.d.J.), and Department of Cardiology (J.J.B.), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; the Diabetes Center (L.J.R., R.J.H, M.D.), Department of Cardiology (O.K.), Department of Physiology (W.J.P.), and Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Research (H.W.A.M.d.J., M.L., A.A.L.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Ind (R.J.H.).
Correspondence to Dr M. Diamant, Diabetes Center, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail m.diamant{at}vumc.nl
Received July 1, 2008; accepted January 27, 2009.
Background— Cardiac disease is the leading cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Pioglitazone has been associated with improved cardiac outcome but also with an elevated risk of heart failure. We determined the effects of pioglitazone on myocardial function in relation to cardiac high-energy phosphate, glucose, and fatty acid metabolism and triglyceride content in T2DM patients.
Methods and Results— Seventy-eight T2DM men without structural heart disease or inducible ischemia as assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography were assigned to pioglitazone (30 mg/d) or metformin (2000 mg/d) and matching placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change in cardiac diastolic function from baseline relative to myocardial metabolic changes, measured by magnetic resonance imaging, proton and phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and [11C]palmitate positron emission tomography. No patient developed heart failure. Both therapies similarly improved glycemic control, whole-body insulin sensitivity, and blood pressure. Pioglitazone versus metformin improved the early peak flow rate (P=0.047) and left ventricular compliance. Pioglitazone versus metformin increased myocardial glucose uptake (P<0.001), but pioglitazone-related diastolic improvement was not associated with changes in myocardial substrate metabolism. Metformin did not affect myocardial function but decreased cardiac work relative to pioglitazone (P=0.006), a change that was paralleled by a reduced myocardial glucose uptake and fatty acid oxidation. Neither treatment affected cardiac high-energy phosphate metabolism or triglyceride content. Only pioglitazone reduced hepatic triglyceride content (P<0.001).
Conclusions— In T2DM patients, pioglitazone was associated with improvement in some measures of left ventricular diastolic function, myocardial glucose uptake, and whole-body insulin sensitivity. The functional changes, however, were not associated with myocardial substrate and high-energy phosphate metabolism.
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. H. Opie and J. Knuuti The adrenergic-Fatty Acid load in heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 27, 2009; 54(18): 1637 - 1646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Gropler Lost in Translation: Modulation of the Metabolic-Functional Relation in the Diabetic Human Heart Circulation, April 21, 2009; 119(15): 2020 - 2022. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |