Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;119:1883-1891
Published online before print March 30, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.812313
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/14/1883    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.812313v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okin, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okin, P. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Electrocardiology
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2009;119:1883-1891.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Epidemiology

Prognostic Value of Changes in the Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern During Antihypertensive Treatment

The Losartan Intervention for End-Point Reduction in Hypertension Study (LIFE)

Peter M. Okin, MD; Lasse Oikarinen, MD; Matti Viitasalo, MD; Lauri Toivonen, MD; Sverre E. Kjeldsen, MD, PhD; Markku S. Nieminen, MD; Jonathan M. Edelman, MD; Björn Dahlöf, MD, PhD; Richard B. Devereux, MD, for the LIFE Study Investigators

From the Greenberg Division of Cardiology (P.M.O., R.B.D.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Division of Cardiology (L.O., M.V., L.T., M.S.N.), Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; University of Oslo (S.E.K.), Ullevål Hospital, Oslo, Norway, and University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich; Merck & Co, Inc (J.M.E.), North Wales, Pa; and Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra (B.D.), Göteborg, Sweden.

Correspondence to Peter M. Okin, MD, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 E 68th St, 4, New York, NY 10065. E-mail pokin{at}mail.med.cornell.edu

Received August 1, 2008; accepted February 9, 2009.

Background— The presence of the ECG strain pattern of lateral ST depression and T-wave inversion at baseline has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; however, the independent predictive value for cardiovascular outcomes of regression versus persistence versus development of new ECG strain during antihypertensive therapy is unclear.

Methods and Results— ECG strain was evaluated at baseline and after 1 year of therapy in 7409 hypertensive patients in the LIFE study (Losartan Intervention For End-point reduction in hypertension) treated in a blinded manner with atenolol- or losartan-based regimens. During 3.8±0.8 years of follow-up after the year 1 ECG, cardiovascular death occurred in 236 patients (3.2%), myocardial infarction in 198 (2.7%), stroke in 313 (4.2%), the LIFE composite end point of these 3 events in 600 (8.1%), sudden death in 92 (1.2%), and death due to any cause in 486 (6.6%). Strain was absent on both baseline and year 1 ECGs in 6323 patients (85.3%), regressed from baseline to year 1 in 245 (3.3%), persisted on both ECGs in 549 (7.4%), and was absent at baseline but developed by year 1 in 292 patients (3.9%). Compared with absence of strain on both ECGs, development of new ECG strain was associated with 2.8- to 4.7-fold higher event rates; patients with regression or persistence of strain had intermediate event rates. In Cox multivariable analyses with adjustment for the known predictive value of in-treatment ECG left ventricular hypertrophy by Cornell product and Sokolow-Lyon voltage, in-treatment systolic and diastolic pressure, randomized treatment, and standard cardiovascular risk factors, development of new ECG strain was independently associated with increased risks of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR] 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56 to 3.76), myocardial infarction (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.44), stroke (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.30 to 3.01), the LIFE composite end point (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.78), sudden cardiac death (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.53), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.69), whereas the risk associated with regression or persistence of strain was attenuated.

Conclusions— Development of new ECG strain is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and of all-cause mortality in the setting of antihypertensive therapy and regression of ECG left ventricular hypertrophy.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 1843-1845. [Extract] [Full Text]