This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the course for this article: Circulation: July 22, 2008, Volume 118, Number 4 All Versions of this Article: 118/4/346    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.108.772822v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Tjønna, A. E. Articles by Wisløff, U. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tjønna, A. E. Articles by Wisløff, U. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Metabolic Syndrome Related Collections Obesity Glucose intolerance Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation Risk Factors Energy metabolism Related Article

(Circulation. 2008;118:346-354.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Exercise Physiology

Aerobic Interval Training Versus Continuous Moderate Exercise as a Treatment for the Metabolic Syndrome

A Pilot Study

Arnt Erik Tjønna, MSc; Sang Jun Lee, PhD; Øivind Rognmo, MSc; Tomas O. Stølen, MSc; Anja Bye, MSc; Per Magnus Haram, PhD; Jan Pål Loennechen, PhD; Qusai Y. Al-Share, MSc; Eirik Skogvoll, PhD; Stig A. Slørdahl, PhD; Ole J. Kemi, PhD; Sonia M. Najjar, PhD^*; Ulrik Wisløff, PhD^*

From the Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging (A.E.T., Ø.R., T.O.S., A.B., P.M.H., J.P.L., S.A.S., U.W.) and Unit for Applied Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine (E.S.), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology and the Center for Diabetes and Endocrine Research, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio (S.J.L., Q.Y.A.-S., S.M.N.); Department of Cardiology (J.P.L., S.A.S., U.W.) and Anaesthesia and Emergency Medicine (E.S.), St Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; and Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK (O.J.K.).

Correspondence to Ulrik Wisløff, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medical Technology Research Center, Olav Kyrres Gate 9, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail ulrik.wisloff{at}ntnu.no

Received October 25, 2007; accepted May 27, 2008.

Background— Individuals with the metabolic syndrome are 3 times more likely to die of heart disease than healthy counterparts. Exercise training reduces several of the symptoms of the syndrome, but the exercise intensity that yields the maximal beneficial adaptations is in dispute. We compared moderate and high exercise intensity with regard to variables associated with cardiovascular function and prognosis in patients with the metabolic syndrome.

Methods and Results— Thirty-two metabolic syndrome patients (age, 52.3±3.7 years; maximal oxygen uptake [O₂max], 34 mL · kg^–1 · min^–1) were randomized to equal volumes of either moderate continuous moderate exercise (CME; 70% of highest measured heart rate [Hfmax]) or aerobic interval training (AIT; 90% of Hfmax) 3 times a week for 16 weeks or to a control group. O₂max increased more after AIT than CME (35% versus 16%; P<0.01) and was associated with removal of more risk factors that constitute the metabolic syndrome (number of factors: AIT, 5.9 before versus 4.0 after; P<0.01; CME, 5.7 before versus 5.0 after; group difference, P<0.05). AIT was superior to CME in enhancing endothelial function (9% versus 5%; P<0.001), insulin signaling in fat and skeletal muscle, skeletal muscle biogenesis, and excitation-contraction coupling and in reducing blood glucose and lipogenesis in adipose tissue. The 2 exercise programs were equally effective at lowering mean arterial blood pressure and reducing body weight (–2.3 and –3.6 kg in AIT and CME, respectively) and fat.

Conclusions— Exercise intensity was an important factor for improving aerobic capacity and reversing the risk factors of the metabolic syndrome. These findings may have important implications for exercise training in rehabilitation programs and future studies.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 118: 321-322. [Full Text]