This Article Free upon publication Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 118/25/2803    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.108.789800v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jneid, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jneid, H. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Attack Related Collections Health policy and outcome research Secondary prevention Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other Acute coronary syndromes Acute myocardial infarction Epidemiology Related Article

(Circulation. 2008;118:2803-2810.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Health Services and Outcomes Research

Sex Differences in Medical Care and Early Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Hani Jneid, MD; Gregg C. Fonarow, MD; Christopher P. Cannon, MD; Adrian F. Hernandez, MD; Igor F. Palacios, MD; Andrew O. Maree, MD; Quinn Wells, MD; Biykem Bozkurt, MD; Kenneth A. LaBresh, MD; Li Liang, PhD; Yuling Hong, MD, PhD; L. Kristin Newby, MD, MHS; Gerald Fletcher, MD; Eric Peterson, MD, MPH; Laura Wexler, MD, for the Get With the Guidelines Steering Committee and Investigators

From the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (H.J., B.B.); University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center (G.C.F.); Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Group and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.P.C.); Duke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (L.L., L.K.N., A.F.H., E.P.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (H.J., I.F.P., A.O.M., Q.W.); MassPro, Inc, Waltham, Mass (K.A.L.); American Heart Association National Center, Dallas, Tex (Y.H.); Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (G.F.); and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (L.W.).

Correspondence to Hani Jneid, MD, Division of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail jneid{at}bcm.tmc.edu

Received April 30, 2008; accepted September 17, 2008.

Background— Women receive less evidence-based medical care than men and have higher rates of death after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is unclear whether efforts undertaken to improve AMI care have mitigated these sex disparities in the current era.

Methods and Results— Using the Get With the Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease database, we examined sex differences in care processes and in-hospital death among 78 254 patients with AMI in 420 US hospitals from 2001 to 2006. Women were older, had more comorbidities, less often presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and had higher unadjusted in-hospital death (8.2% versus 5.7%; P<0.0001) than men. After multivariable adjustment, sex differences in in-hospital mortality rates were no longer observed in the overall AMI cohort (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.04; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.10) but persisted among STEMI patients (10.2% versus 5.5%; P<0.0001; adjusted OR=1.12; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.23). Compared with men, women were less likely to receive early aspirin treatment (adjusted OR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.90), early β-blocker treatment (adjusted OR=0.90; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.93), reperfusion therapy (adjusted OR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.80), or timely reperfusion (door-to-needle time 30 minutes: adjusted OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.92; door-to-balloon time 90 minutes: adjusted OR=0.87; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95). Women also experienced lower use of cardiac catheterization and revascularization procedures after AMI.

Conclusions— Overall, no sex differences in in-hospital mortality rates after AMI were observed after multivariable adjustment. However, women with STEMI had higher adjusted mortality rates than men. The underuse of evidence-based treatments and delayed reperfusion among women represent potential opportunities for reducing sex disparities in care and outcome after AMI.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 118: 2667-2668. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. K. Jacobs Coronary Intervention in 2009: Are Women No Different Than Men? Circ Cardiovasc Intervent, February 1, 2009; 2(1): 69 - 78. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Sex Differences Persist in Treatment for AMI Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, January 9, 2009; 2009(109): 3 - 3. [Full Text]

				Sex Differences in AMI Outcomes Journal Watch Women's Health, January 8, 2009; 2009(108): 3 - 3. [Full Text]